@PetraSuMaier @ComicDaveSmith @rdlln @PeterRQuinones @DrewScottOne3 @joedieseldodge @chrishudsonjr @PSchwartzIDS @HBinswanger I used the term contract because it is often used to describe the unspoken agreement between those who live in a society. Commonly, that ‘contract’ has foisted unchosen obligations on some men. But, as you suggest, such a contract would not be valid. But a contract deferring
@PetraSuMaier @ComicDaveSmith @rdlln @PeterRQuinones @DrewScottOne3 @joedieseldodge @chrishudsonjr @PSchwartzIDS @HBinswanger Some types of force to an objective process is one that everyone in society need not sign... as a rights respecting gov cannot and does not have to get the direct consent of ALL parties. Anyone NOT consenting to rights protection or to subordinate force to reason is claiming the
@PetraSuMaier @ComicDaveSmith @rdlln @PeterRQuinones @DrewScottOne3 @joedieseldodge @chrishudsonjr @PSchwartzIDS @HBinswanger Right to monopoly force himself. All force is a monopoly by its NATURE. You are just claiming it’s good to have a million monopolies instead of one governed by singular principles. I say no. When you have a million monopolies all claiming the right to exercise force you are
@PetraSuMaier @ComicDaveSmith @rdlln @PeterRQuinones @DrewScottOne3 @joedieseldodge @chrishudsonjr @PSchwartzIDS @HBinswanger Subjectivizing force. When you have a million people agreeing to yield some aspect of force to process you are subordinating whim to an objective, reason based process of finding truth and executing proportional punishment. Not so in your anarchist world. And the problem I have
@PetraSuMaier @ComicDaveSmith @rdlln @PeterRQuinones @DrewScottOne3 @joedieseldodge @chrishudsonjr @PSchwartzIDS @HBinswanger Is that you can’t see that all force is monopoly... and deferring to process is promoting reason over violence.
