, 3 tweets, 1 min read
My Authors
Read all threads
This BBC headline has been getting a lot of attention, and is an inaccurate framing of our recent Nature piece. We argue that its misleading when the RCP8.5 emission pathway is used as "business-as-usual". Its not misleading when its described as a worst-case scenario. 1/2
As we've pointed out, while the emissions underlying RCP8.5 are increasingly implausible, its harder to rule out that level of forcing/warming given uncertainties in carbon feedbacks. Its unlikely in a current policies world, but far from impossible. 2/2
Its important to distinguish between emissions pathways and warming outcomes (which depend on emissions, carbon cycle feedbacks, and climate sensitivity). While more clarity on emissions somewhat narrows warming outcomes, large uncertainties remain!
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with Zeke Hausfather

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!