Nice. @ewarren isn’t backing down from her claim of what the woman said about Bloomberg, despite @HardballChris incredulity.
She. Believes. The Woman.
When Matthews asked why would he lie, she said “why would SHE lie?”
This is the attitude change we *need.*
She. Believes. The Woman.
When Matthews asked why would he lie, she said “why would SHE lie?”
This is the attitude change we *need.*
Now, when asked why she’s going after Bloomberg and not Bernie, she says Bloomberg (NOT Bernie) is the most dangerous candidate on stage because he’s trying to buy an election.
Principles. These are principles over electoral politics.
Principles. These are principles over electoral politics.
And now she’s nuking the filibuster.
Well then, @Lawrence very kindly explains the filibuster, and why people are suggesting nuking it, to... anybody who might need this education.
I think nuking the filibuster is critically important because it’s the only way to get started on Court reform
