This tweet is rightly getting ratio'ed because the 'both sides' thing is bad faith nonsense.
On one side: rape & death threats, doxxing, no-platforming, trying to get people fired.
On the other side: some snark
Ask for receipts... nothing.
Here are some
Their evidence...
Laura Pidcock wrote in Tribune “The women’s movement needs the space to talk about sex and gender, without fear of being ‘no platformed’ (um, okay....)
bastards" .
...presented as "The official view of WPUK on trans women"
vimeo.com/254644146
And a vague accusation of "increasing harassment on social media" (with no receipts)
Thats it. Thats all
(I know right, a 70 year old woman talking about self defence, terrifying)
2harecourt.com/2018/11/30/gud…
eachother.org.uk/linda-bellos-f…
It was absolutely terrifying apparently....
eachother.org.uk/how-media-miss…
And then there is @bindelj wrongthinking repeatedly
theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
(she is appealing)
"He mentions that transgender women are born biologically male."
That is "transphobia in a nutshell" says Mrs B judicialcat.blogspot.com/2020/02/harry-…
buzzfeed.com/patrickstrudwi…
(that part of the case did not go anywhere)
(they also sat in the audience at an event hosted at a right wing think tank, so obviously bad people... )
This was so heinous that @libertyhq and @AmnestyUK @KateAllenAI @marthaspurrier wrote in to complain
And it has provoked a disproportionate reaction
(Which perhaps to the casual observer looks like 'both sides')
1) You are falling into the trap of punishing women for failing to be nice and act as 'support humans'
2) You are giving support to a movement trying to shut down ordinary political debate & safeguarding discussions