Can someone please link a scientific study or hard evidence that 80% are mild/asymptomatic?
A person linked to me the original "86% are asymptomatic" study from early February. science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/su…
It has a HUGE assumption:
"(2000 initial latent (E0) and undocumented infections (I0
u) on January 10" But only 41 known then.
So that's 50x known, huge leap.
It has a HUGE assumption:
"(2000 initial latent (E0) and undocumented infections (I0
u) on January 10" But only 41 known then.
So that's 50x known, huge leap.
WOW! According to their own model "A 1.39% infection rate suggests an estimated 83,400 infections prior
to February 1 in Wuhan" but real-world data shows 11,791 confirmed. That's where they get their 86% number.
So were there 83,400 infections or less by then?
to February 1 in Wuhan" but real-world data shows 11,791 confirmed. That's where they get their 86% number.
So were there 83,400 infections or less by then?
Using their assumed 2,000 on 10 Jan, that's 5.5 doublings on with 4 days to double. 22 days. It all rests on that 2,000 initial.
