Both/and. The issues of manipulation of our reality is true. That said, I have seen some of the most educated and supposedly intelligent so-called skeptics engage in high school types of clique behavior and had their biases exploited as @RogueRad references below.
The other thing I have noticed is that rivalries in healthcare
that have long existed between doctors
now expanded to all the different types of clinicians
+
healthcare industry professionals.
Savvy non-clinicians exploit the backstabbing, bullying culture of healthcare
This is so pronounced that @TJCommission has published this on it including using the term “sabotage.”
These are things typically done via gossip, in the dark, without due process as compared to use of transparency and appropriate mechanisms
In regards to the “hidden curriculum” towards POC in healthcare, the usual process is to create gossip, defame, create doubt, negatively label, use nebulous or flat out wrong “professionalism” or “you did something wrong” standard prior to an official action as per @COCoQC
As a pediatrician, I look back on my career and the many times I have signed papers and I am horrified at wondering how many times I was the hand (literally) of an unjust system and the so-called “model minority.” See concerning attitudes among peers too.
Bullying or cliques not limited to race, but when bullying & cliques exist, race will be used for labels of who is “wrong”, “bad”, or “out group” for censure, isolation, blocking
So #MedTwitter’s cliques makes it a prime space for bullying based on policing others, in particular the “safe space” concept.
“Safe”
for whom?
from whom?
If you are not Black or BIPOC, your idea of safe space may actually be oppression/suppression
I see an unofficial segregation of #BlackTwitter and #BlackMedTwitter from #MedTwitter and times I have invited those from the former into spaces of the latter... wow.. not pretty. Many people simply can not tolerate anything that is not validation and 🏆 theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
Some the most vocal on #equity are really “fakequity”
hashtag use signals what should be a safe space
then react with violent emotions
when their ego, image, control threatened
by a removal of silos and real, uncontrolled communication
There are SO many other ways, apart from race, that one can create “boundaries” (live in a bubble where you never hear anything different from your own beliefs and only ever get validation) - and that is why people ask “What happened to America”? Nothing happened. You were
Alternatively, there are those whose tweets are primarily to ridicule others. That’s also a great way to be unaware and engage in cliquish behaviors that reinforce bubbles of ignorance of the world outside of your own limited one.
Please start to do this. If you find something not factual, take the time to highlight, cross out, write notes on the image. We are highly visual creatures and the red X will communicate much better than your facts or words.
Further, think of unintended consequences. Will what you put out there take a life if its own?
I have seen too many of those paid to instruct #STEM professionals on #SciComm & #MedTwitter professionalism
fail to understand this aspect of #SciComm - how will others repurpose?
How often in re-sharing a conspiracy theory post are you merely driving traffic to that site or person? It is a numbers game. In your “OMG look at this!!!!” are you contributing to this?
Please stay away from those who share a new “look how bad” example
Yes, @KamalaHarris is able to smile through her debates and adhere to expected gender norms and avoid any hint of the racist trope of “angry” as a Black woman. But is that really what makes her qualified? Or is it a career worth of experience as well as times she persisted?
What are our priorities? In a busy world, we will only have a chance to achieve 3-5 max. If we put polite and being on time in those top 3-5, where does addressing safety, quality, inequity, mental health fall? Are we judging someone on timeliness who may have chronic illness?
Absolutely. Sound even so the “don’t talk to her, DM me instead.” Also, plenty of men gossip or encourage women to gossip and spread gossip to achieve an agenda or neutralize someone.
Isolating people, preventing communication with someone, moving communication to dark spaces, DM conversations about others ..are all red flags for bullying.
On "called in" versus "called out": in fact, a true ally can tolerate being "called out" to model #learning#mindset/#growthmindset for others. Those who need everything to be done hidden/in private reveal they care more about image, optics, their own reputation.
People need to let go of this concept of "shame" or "did you just call me a racist"? Everyone has more to learn. Was just discussing with a woman who pointed out elite programs in the U.S. fulfill "diversity" quotas with "Black" from Africa rather than descendants of slaves.
The underlying issue of exploitation, specifically slavery, was #economic. The experience of personal + generational trauma + loss of generational wealth + loss of identity is a deliberate #systematic#systems approach to value extraction for economics.
So true. In my case, don’t pick on a POC, WOC, student, trainee, refugee, someone with disability, someone with mental health, etc then deny/justify you did so, flip the script, or manipulate optics.
Our generations had to work 3x harder for everything. It makes us relentless.
Finally watched Gaslight (movie that gives us the term) This is so classic (not just men who fit this mold). When someone who is all about “optics”, manipulates who talks to whom in what spaces, starts to be revealed, they play victim/appeal to emotions
Ingrid Bergman is so powerful in that scene. Love it. Uff..her turning the tables to play the same game back to him just for a few powerful moments. Previously he had made a point to humiliate her in public while making her and others think she was insane
Someday soon this labor of love and product of dogged persistence will officially be published after something like 100 edits to slide format, removal of any photos not from Creative Commons, adding content, updating references, expanding on limitations.
Yes, I am relentless.
When it comes to protecting the marginalized and vulnerable from the bullies spreading xenophobia, cutting funding, closing clinics, I am non-stop
With every clinical service closure I am more and more pointed on understanding what administrative budgets are used for
I was CMO of a 14-center FQHC that also was a dedicated refugee screening center and no, this type of care is NOT any CFOs favorite tho the mission driven ones figure out a way to serve mission at the cost of margin and get the revenue from elsewhere.