Yes, @KamalaHarris is able to smile through her debates and adhere to expected gender norms and avoid any hint of the racist trope of “angry” as a Black woman. But is that really what makes her qualified? Or is it a career worth of experience as well as times she persisted?
What are our priorities? In a busy world, we will only have a chance to achieve 3-5 max. If we put polite and being on time in those top 3-5, where does addressing safety, quality, inequity, mental health fall? Are we judging someone on timeliness who may have chronic illness?
Am not saying no accountability. Let’s think carefully about top priorities and think carefully if we judge without knowledge.
Personally I participate in few #WIM and #PROWD type events as I don’t share the priorities.
It does not happen to me, though. I speak first and no one interrupts me. I will make a second comment.
I have heard from several men I take up too much airtime. First what is too much? What about the too few women in the class itself?
Also, 🤷🏻♀️ This is b-school. Outcompete me.
Women win smaller grants.
There are myriad factors that contribute.
But if we ourselves rate polite or manners as top priorities, aren’t we always trying to make ourselves small to stay within boxes others’ drew/defined?
“investors ..promotion orientation when quizzing male entrepreneurs..on hopes, achievements, advancement, and ideals..when questioning female entrepreneurs..a prevention orientation, which is concerned with safety, responsibility, security, and vigilance.” hbr.org/2017/06/male-a…
More evidence women embrace roles of control, policing others, enforcing existing rules/status quo.
Then we wonder why we women can’t advance or be seen as leaders.
Women focused on manners & on compliance with rules make the glass ceiling thicker.
It has an even more sinister aspect when applied to race
there is an unintended consequence that the people in HR, compliance, leadership charged with enforcing the rules are the barriers to diversity or to psychological safety of BIPOC themselves.
Not suggesting anarchy. Saying question who wrote the rules, what purpose they were intended to serve, whose interests they serve, what inequity they create, what barriers the create, who defines “nice” or “good” or “polite” (all subjective, not with clear, consistent criteria).
Women are interrupted a lot. Others already at the table are not polite
then tell new entrants that being allowed at the table requires having manners.
In fact “high ranking women” interrupt back. Give as good as you get instead of seeking permission
Ethics matter. Where in feminism is ethics built in? (Manners are not the same as ethics) Facebook is hugely successful but has also been credited with spreading misinformation & #pandemic conspiracies. So am wary of career advice based on that success
Those of us South Asian must be mindful whether we assimilate so much into American culture that we fail to question the underpinning of inequity. Why are we so often welcomed as the “model minority”? We are accommodated already to layer under power (from colonialism)
Many of us born in the U.S. don’t know this history.
This is why you see many South Asian embracing embracing Lean In. Black women recognize the way Lean In aligns with status quo of inequity to advance oneself within the existing hierarchy, does not work for all.
If I wanted to be a police woman I would have chosen that field. I want to change things for population health outcomes. When will our conversations in #WIM#PROWD really address system level issues for impact at scale?
We need women & BIPOC in spaces where there are few women or BIPOC like #tech or #STEM or #artificialintelligence#AI#ML - go where there is no path. Build the path. Go where there are no predefined metrics. Write the rules yourself. @nature#WomeninSTEM
Please start to do this. If you find something not factual, take the time to highlight, cross out, write notes on the image. We are highly visual creatures and the red X will communicate much better than your facts or words.
Further, think of unintended consequences. Will what you put out there take a life if its own?
I have seen too many of those paid to instruct #STEM professionals on #SciComm & #MedTwitter professionalism
fail to understand this aspect of #SciComm - how will others repurpose?
How often in re-sharing a conspiracy theory post are you merely driving traffic to that site or person? It is a numbers game. In your “OMG look at this!!!!” are you contributing to this?
Please stay away from those who share a new “look how bad” example
Absolutely. Sound even so the “don’t talk to her, DM me instead.” Also, plenty of men gossip or encourage women to gossip and spread gossip to achieve an agenda or neutralize someone.
Isolating people, preventing communication with someone, moving communication to dark spaces, DM conversations about others ..are all red flags for bullying.
Both/and. The issues of manipulation of our reality is true. That said, I have seen some of the most educated and supposedly intelligent so-called skeptics engage in high school types of clique behavior and had their biases exploited as @RogueRad references below.
On "called in" versus "called out": in fact, a true ally can tolerate being "called out" to model #learning#mindset/#growthmindset for others. Those who need everything to be done hidden/in private reveal they care more about image, optics, their own reputation.
People need to let go of this concept of "shame" or "did you just call me a racist"? Everyone has more to learn. Was just discussing with a woman who pointed out elite programs in the U.S. fulfill "diversity" quotas with "Black" from Africa rather than descendants of slaves.
The underlying issue of exploitation, specifically slavery, was #economic. The experience of personal + generational trauma + loss of generational wealth + loss of identity is a deliberate #systematic#systems approach to value extraction for economics.
So true. In my case, don’t pick on a POC, WOC, student, trainee, refugee, someone with disability, someone with mental health, etc then deny/justify you did so, flip the script, or manipulate optics.
Our generations had to work 3x harder for everything. It makes us relentless.
Finally watched Gaslight (movie that gives us the term) This is so classic (not just men who fit this mold). When someone who is all about “optics”, manipulates who talks to whom in what spaces, starts to be revealed, they play victim/appeal to emotions
Ingrid Bergman is so powerful in that scene. Love it. Uff..her turning the tables to play the same game back to him just for a few powerful moments. Previously he had made a point to humiliate her in public while making her and others think she was insane
Someday soon this labor of love and product of dogged persistence will officially be published after something like 100 edits to slide format, removal of any photos not from Creative Commons, adding content, updating references, expanding on limitations.
Yes, I am relentless.
When it comes to protecting the marginalized and vulnerable from the bullies spreading xenophobia, cutting funding, closing clinics, I am non-stop
With every clinical service closure I am more and more pointed on understanding what administrative budgets are used for
I was CMO of a 14-center FQHC that also was a dedicated refugee screening center and no, this type of care is NOT any CFOs favorite tho the mission driven ones figure out a way to serve mission at the cost of margin and get the revenue from elsewhere.