Although it’s early days in the reporting period for football club accounts from the extended 2019/20 season, we can already see the significant impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in a few selected announcements from some European clubs, which this thread will examine.
Although a large part of the 2019/20 season was completed before the lockdown, there has been a major adverse impact on these clubs’ accounts with massive losses being announced at #ASRoma €204m, #Milan €195m, #FCBarcelona €97m, #Juventus €90m, #BVB €44m and #TeamOL €37m.
#RealMadrid managed to still report a small €320k profit, but this was down from prior season’s €38m, while #SSLazio restricted their loss to “only” €16m (from €13m). #Benfica actually improved their profit from €28m to €42m, but only due to €126m profit from player sales.
Except #Benfica, all these clubs have suffered reductions in their bottom line, the largest being #ASRoma €180m, #FCBarcelona €102m and #BVB €61m. That said, some had already posted large losses pre-COVID, e.g. #Milan went from €146m to €195m #Juventus from €40m to €90m.
By my calculations, the #ASRoma €204m and #Milan €195m losses are the second and third highest losses ever in Italy, only surpassed by #Inter €207m in 2006/07. Not far behind largest ever loss of €219m by #MCFC in 2010/11.
It is also worth noting that these terrible figures would have been even worse without some hefty profits on player sales, including #Juventus €167m (up from €127m), #Benfica €126m (up from €70m), #FCBarcelona €95m and #TeamOL €83m. However, #BVB fell from €83m to €40m.
Most of these player sales were made before the pandemic struck, i.e. summer 2019 and January 2020. However, these profits are likely to be lower in the 2020/21 accounts, as the transfer market has been depressed this summer (with the exception of a few Premier League clubs).
The pandemic has hit all revenue streams: match day (some games played behind closed doors), broadcasting (rebates to TV companies) and commercial (sponsorships and merchandising). Largest known revenue reductions were #FCBarcelona €115m, #Juventus €88m and #TeamOL €40m.
So #FCBarcelona revenue (excluding player sales) fell 13% from €876m to €761m, while #Juventus dropped 18% from €494m to €407m and #TeamOL 18% from €221m to €181m. #BVB revenue was flat at €379m, though growth was restricted by COVID.
Some clubs have partially compensated for their revenue losses by reducing their wage bills, e.g. #Juventus €43m (four months salary not paid from May to June), #FCBarcelona €36m (70% cut during lockdown) and #SSLazio €18m (two months salary given up).
Of course, some of these wage bills are still very high, e.g. #FCBarcelona cut 7% from €542m to €506m (all sports, not just football), while #Juventus decreased 13% from €328m to €284m. #BVB and #TeamOL slightly rose, by 5% to €215m and 1% to €133m respectively.
#FCBarcelona have had to increase their bank debt by €209m from €271m to €480m. #Juventus actually reduced their financial debt by €77m from €473m to €396m, but they did benefit from a massive €298m capital injection from their owners.
As at 30th June 2020, most clubs saw little impact on their cash balances, except #BVB who fell from €56m to €3m. However, with revenue so badly hit, many have had to address liquidity concerns since then, e.g. #TeamOL took out €93m government loan in July.
However, all clubs have increased their transfer debt, i.e. are making increasing use of paying transfers in instalments, especially #FCBarcelona up €62m to €323m, #Juventus up €80m to €301m, #TeamOL up €95m to €135m and #BVB up €72m to €120m.
Of course, transfer dealings work both ways, so we should also look at net transfer debt, where largest amounts owed are #FCBarcelona €155m (up €72m), #TeamOL €101m (up €154m) and #BVB €87m (up €71m). #Juventus are owed €296m by others, so net debt down €17m to only €5m.
#FCBarcelona provided a detailed analysis of COVID impact, which has reduced net profit by €101m, comprising €203m revenue loss (stadium €67m, TV €35m, commercial €72m and transfers €29m), partially offset by €74m cost savings (wages €44m, other €30m) & €30m lower tax.
It’s obvious that clubs lose match day income when playing games behind closed doors, but what is perhaps more revealing is the substantial reduction in commercial revenue via reduced sponsorship and lower retail sales. If that’s the case at #FCBarcelona, what about others?
#FCBarcelona were keen to emphasise that without COVID they would have achieved their objective of reaching €1 bln revenue (including player sales) in 2019/20, i.e. growing €69m from €990m to €1,059m. However, the pandemic caused a €203m loss, reducing revenue to €856m.
#FCBarcelona have estimated a further €65m reduction in revenue in 2020/21 from €856m to €791m, partly mitigated by including TV money for 2019/20 competitions completed in July and August. That would mean a total revenue loss of nearly half a billion (€471m) over two years.
Clearly, football clubs are suffering from the impact of the pandemic. This is only a small sample, but it is a sign of things to come at every club, namely large revenue reductions, partly mitigated by cost savings, covered by taking on more debt or capital put in by owners.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This thread will look at debt at football clubs, focusing on the Premier League Big Six. The fundamental question is whether this debt is too high, but the answer is complicated by the numerous definitions of debt, all of which can be valid #AFC#CFC#LFC#MCFC#MUFC#THFC
At the narrowest extreme, we have just bank debt, but the broadest extreme covers total liabilities, which includes all financial obligations, including transfer debt, tax liabilities, trade creditors, provisions for future losses, accrued expenses and even deferred income.
The net debt reported in an English club’s financial statement is in line with IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards) and essentially covers purely financial obligations, such as overdrafts, bank loans, bonds, shareholder loans and finance leases less cash.
Borussia Dortmund 2019/20 accounts cover a season when they once again finished second behind Bayern Munich in the Bundesliga and reached the Champions League last 16. However, COVID-19 meant it was “an unprecedented, difficult and challenging year.” Some thoughts follow #BVB
#BVB went from €22m profit before tax to €47m loss (€44m after tax), mainly due to profit on player sales falling €43m to €40m. Despite the COVID restrictions, revenue was basically flat at €379m, but operating expenses rose €25m and net interest payable was €2m higher.
The only #BVB revenue item to decrease was match operations, down €12m (27%) to €33m, but the pandemic restricted growth in broadcasting, up €3m (1%) to €170m, commercial, up €10m (6%) to €168m, and other operating income, up €1m to €9m.
#Juventus 2019/20 accounts cover a COVID impacted season when they won the league (for the 9th year in a row), but were eliminated in the Champions League last 16 by Lyon. Head coach Max Allegri was replaced by Andrea Pirlo after the season ended. Some thoughts follow.
#Juventus loss before tax widened from €27m to €82m (€90m after tax), as revenue fell €88m (18%) from €494m to €407m, partly offset by €43m (13%) wages cut from €328m to €284m and profit on player sales rising €40m to €167m, though non cash flow expenses were up €48m.
Driven by COVID, all #Juventus revenue streams fell, including broadcasting, down €40m (19%) to €166m, and match day, down €21m (30%) to €49m. Commercial only fell €1m to €186m, as new sponsorships compensated for lower merchandising sales. Player loans down €25m to €5m.
Following the government announcement that plans to allow fans to attend football matches from 1st October would not go ahead, I thought it might be interesting to see how this could impact the revenue of Premier League clubs this season via match day losses due to COVID-19.
First of all, a reminder of how much match day income each Premier League club generated in 2018/19 (the season with the most recent published accounts), including estimates for clubs that have been promoted from the Championship since then.
In 2018/19 Premier League clubs had around £700m of match day revenue with #MUFC leading the way with £111m, followed by #AFC £96m, #LFC £84m, #THFC £82m, #CFC £676m and #MCFC £55m. At the other end of the spectrum, clubs like Burnley, #WBA and #SUFC had less than £10m.
Football clubs generate most of their cash from revenue they earn from gate receipts, TV deals, prize money, sponsorship and merchandising, but often they need additional financing, either from their owners or the banks. This thread looks at financing in the Premier League.
This analysis will cover the last five years from 2014/15 to 2018/19 (the last season when accounts are available), looking at the 20 clubs currently in the Premier League, i.e. including those promoted last season.
In the last 5 years, the 20 Premier League clubs have benefited from £1.9 bln net financing with most of the money coming from their owners £1,569m (81%) and another £366m (19%) sourced from banks. However, there is a big difference between business models at individual clubs.
Many Liverpool fans cannot understand why their club seems unwilling to buy players. Surely they should be awash with cash after winning the Champions League and then the Premier League? This thread looks at where the money has gone and suggests why they are not buying #LFC
To date this summer #LFC have only spent £12m on Olympiacos full-back Tsimikas, while #CFC have splashed £201m. Other have been more prudent, but still been more active than the Reds: #MCFC £71m, #THFC £59m, #MUFC £35m and #SFC £31m. #LFC actually have £3m net sales.
It was a similar story last season, when #LFC only spent £9m, mainly Minamino from RB Salzburg, so gross spend over last 2 seasons is just £21m with £31m net sales. In terms of purchases, this is way behind rest of the Big 6 (£175m to £241m), though #CFC also had net sales.