But I found the similarities (and concurrence) between the rise of Berlusconi's #MediaSet & #FoxNews more unnerving.
Both became so powerful they set the tone & agenda for the main broadcasters.
Berlusconi's #MediaSet managed to transform the content of Italian public broadcaster RAI just as #FoxNews managed to transform the news content of the main US networks. Both were coarsened.
The 'sexy shopping' segment aired on RAI 2, not Mediaset.
In both cases, main networks felt they had to compete with the upstart private broadcasters by tacking to the right and having more content like this on their news shows.
Something to think about for Brits who will soon get their own Fox with the launch of Andrew Neil's GB News.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Indeed. The fisheries issue is a red herring, if you'll pardon the pun.
If there is #NoDealBrexit it will not be because of a dispute over fish, as the UK media is suggesting, but because of UK's refusal to follow some LPF rules in exchange for tariff-free access to EU market.
There is a reason the UK briefs as if fisheries is the main stumbling bloc. It's a very small (though very emotional) part of the economy and the EU's stance is not very sympathetic. But it's a side issue.
LPF and governance goes to the heart of what #Brexit will and won't be.
The UK side doesn't want to talk about LPF because it highlights the lack of thinking that went into the #Brexit plan before the referendum.
#Norway & #Switzerland were used as examples, but then after the vote their models were immediately ruled out because they're rule-takers.
Anybody saying the GSA starting the @JoeBiden transition shows "the guardrails of American democracy are strong" is delusional.
It looks like we will make it to 20 January without US democracy collapsing. But Europeans need to remember how close we came.
"The problem with the plan—the thing that stopped it—wasn't so much the institutions. It's just that #Trump lost the election by too much to really pull his plan off,” notes @ChrislHayes.
Where would we be right now if it had come down to just one state?
What the US has just gone through has "revealed craters in the foundation of our democracy" says @JNelsonLDF.
"If we want to be a country based on the #RuleOfLaw, we need stronger laws. We can't rely on norms that can be disregarded when it's in someone's political interest".
Even countries most exposed to #NoDealBrexit dangers are saying EU shouldn't back down on #Brexit.
Belgium is the 2nd most exposed, but PM @AlexanderDeCroo says in late-night presser that "it would be crazy not to have a deal but it would be even more crazy to have a bad deal".
De Croo says this resolve is hardening "more and more" on EU side.
"Granting access of the UK to the European market, if you want to that, then we need assurances on the way the UK is going to play the game".
Because trust is low (especially after UK made plans to renege on withdrawal treaty), a sanctions mechanism need to be in place if UK violates FTA.
The UK could “possibly have some predatory behaviour which could be very negative for the European economy"
As we get to the home stretch of #Brexit negotiations, the UK side is questioning whether the FTA deal on offer from the EU is really worth signing.
The complaint: EU isn't giving the same level of market access as other FTAs it's signed, for instance with Canada and Japan.
So what people will be keenly watching from the #EUCO tomorrow is whether EU27 prime ministers and presidents flesh out the meat on the bone in terms of what's actually on offer.
But EU says it's already spelled out what's on offer quite clearly.
The big question: Will Johnson stick to his 15 October deal-or-no-deal deadline?
Probably not, it appears. UK side now saying it will assess whether there's been sufficient progress to continue talks.
But practical reality is a deal needed now to be ratified in time for 31 Dec.