I think #vaccinepassports or #vaccinecertificates are a bad idea, and governments really need to think carefully before proceeding. They are a Pandora's Box.
Ultimately health status should not be the determinant of one's rights. A🧵
Firstly, in a pandemic intensifying all societal inequalities, we shouldnt be introducing mechanisms to further compound these. Those who are unable to get vaccinated (for health reasons, pregnant women) will be immediately discriminated against.
In the short term, this will also include younger people, leading to intergenerational tension, and indeed children who currently are not being vaccinated, and this in turn may discriminate against parents (mothers) if unable to interact in public when looking after them
Globally, this also discriminates against those from LMICs who do not have access to vaccines (and may not across whole population for many years). Requiring vaccine passports at borders /airlines means those nationals will be prohibited from intl travel (and trade, leisure etc)
Let's also not forget vaccine hesitancy a real thing - particularly amongst historically marginalised groups. Whilst some suggest vaccine passports incentivise vaccination, it also may further stigmatise / exclude those who dont wish to be vaccinated (nb. I am pro vaccine)
How does this play out if employment, for example, is contingent on vaccination? Can people lose their jobs because of decision making about their health?
Many are comparing to Yellow Fever or Polio certificates required, but these are not limited by finite supply and global distribution dynamics + economics. countries actively provide vaccines to travellers, but this isnt the same model (and not used for domestic life)
Those who are pushing vaccine certificates have different incentives - eg. countries reliant on tourism industries, companies wanting to build consumer confidence, but these should not be the driver of a UK government policy
If anything, the UK government should be seeking to regulate / limit / prohibit the use of any mechanism introduced by private companies thinking of introducing their own
And what happens if variants reduce effectiveness of different vaccines? Will vaccine passports stipulate which vaccine you have had i.e. you can only go into a shop/bar/country if you've had Pfizer vaccine, but not if you've had AZ?
This above is also something out of individual control, determined by which vaccines individual countries have purchased, supply of that vaccine and distribution nationally.
Instead we should be thinking of alternative policy interventions. How do we get numbers globally as low as possible, how do we ensure vaccine uptake, how do we use rapid testing (and effective rapid testing) in locations which would otherwise want passports.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Lockdown 3.0 will disproportionately affect #women, and #ukgov isnt doing enough to mitigate this unequal impact.
A thread on what we know from the last year *and before 🧵
According to @ONS women did 2/3rds additional childcare duties + spent more time on unpaid work + less time on paid work than men during lockdown1.0
ONS also show that women did more non-developmental care than men (i.e. cooking, washing, not playing) shorturl.at/gjrCY
Whether due to gendered work sectors, or requests owing to additional childcare: women more likely to be furloughed than men according to @WomensBudgetGrp meaning 20% income reduction
We found that whilst #zika spurred abortion demand amongst individual womxn and global debate on #reproductiverights - the heath emergency didn’t change national regulation or policy change for abortion access.
2/
This was on account of the narrow policy path dependency in #globalhealthsecurity focused on epidemiology which did not consider gendered needs or the broader social effects of epidemics, combined with deeply conservative context + recent political history
3/
The thing that makes me the most frustrated about #COVID19 (and has for many months) is the failure to learn lessons from previous outbreaks, particularly about the downstream effects of #pandemic response policy. A thread 1/
This morning @BBCr4today@TheCrick discussed disruption to non-covid #clinicaltrials ; also have seen depressing delays to #cancer detection and treatment ; and changes to routine SRH, maternity, NCD, mental health services.
Economic disaster at macro + micro levels follow outbreaks - look at economic impact SE Asia post #SARS and W-Africa post #Ebola ... and to look at individual narratives of household financial hardships & increases in poverty (w/associated disease, kids out of school to work) 3/
As #Brazil becomes the new epicentre of #COVID19 these are my must reads to understand the political context in which the outbreak emerged and the impact of this (a thread)
This piece by @Deisy_Ventura early on in the outbreak captures a lot of the anticipated tensions within the SUS (unified health system); between Bolsonaro, science and populism (similar in many ways to US, UK etc) - which unfortunately have become real!
A thread of thoughts about why #COVID19 is so remarkable having studied #globalhealthsecurity and politics of health emergencies for several years - almost every element could and has been predicted #COVID#covid19UK (1/11) :
Academics have thought that a major outbreak would emerge in China, and this would be challenged by tensions over veracity of Chinese data (the memory of #SARS not easily forgotten) tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10… (2/11)