This time, going after $ARKK - Well, the lot of em.
I heard that #Cathiewood had obtained a large amount of the float of some Illiquid stocks, and i wanted to see how big the problem was.
And i found out this woman has no clue what she's investing in. Thread 👇
So what i did;
Courtesy of arktrack.com and seekingalpha.com, i went through $ARKK's most illiquid names, to see how difficult it would be to liquidate those positions - AND to see if the companies are valued anywhere near correctly.
So i looked at some stats.
I looked at shares per company and the float, then calculated how much of that float ARK has across all funds (using the "individual stocks" tab on the site).
That's necessary because *multiple ARK funds own ALL of them!*
Also looked at 3month and 7day average volume.
For nigh all - 7D volume is well below 3M volume, and thus, liquidity is scarcer now then before.
And i looked at some value stats: Market cap (M.C.), Price to book (P/B), Debt to equity (DtE) and especially Net Income. (N.I.)
Stuff's gotta make money or not lose too much.
Also, interesting tidbit:
I added value of ARK's holdings vs total market cap of companies, and alot of the times it lines up! But alot of the times, it does not.
Think it might be a good indicator of when Cathie overpaid,"got in early" or made even on her investment.
Finally, i added a few comments from my own analysis beyond these numbers (which you guys know you've seen me stream) as to why the company's bad.
Oh, they're bad. High risk moonshots, the lot. I haven't gone through quarterlies, so i'm not up to date on drug trials.
But i know my financial stats, and i know what - as a value investor - i wouldn't touch with a 10 foot pole.
Also i added short interest (S.I.) to see what the market thinks of the stock. Hint: It's about as high as my stoned ass. On ALOT of these stocks.
Pacific Biosciences of California - 193,10m shares/99,03% float
20,480,339 ARKK/ARKG - 10,71% of float
658,65m value - 5,94B M.C. - 11,08% of cap
Avg.Vol. 7D - 3,007,445
Avg.Vol. 3M - 4,628,574
P/B - 17,62 - 12,52% DtE
Continued 👇
2016 Operating income: -$71,2 million
2020 Operating income: -$98,4 million (sideways)
(N.I. distorted by $233m stock issuance)
(highest Revenue on Dec 2017 was $93,5m - Retained earnings -$1,036.9m. That's never coming back)
6% S.I.
Veracyte inc - 67m shares/99,16% float
7,326,482 ARKK/ARKW/ARKG - 11,02% of float
385,15m value - 3,46B M.C. - 9.97% of cap
Avg.Vol. 7D - 522,786
Avg.Vol. 3M - 1,057,622
P/B - 7,14 - 2,92% DtE
2016 N.I.: -$31,4M
2020 N.I.: -$34,9M (👉)
(cash parabolic. 10x Dec 2017)
5,39% S.I.
Editas Medicine inc. - 67,24m shares/98,71% float
7,295,189 ARKK/ARKG - 10,99% of float
287,87m value - 2,66B M.C. - 10,82%
Avg.Vol. 7D - 1,104,132
Avg.Vol. 3M - 2,440,342
P/B - 6,28 - DtE 6,64%
2016 N.I.: -$97,2 million
2020 N.I.: -$116 million (declining)
Continued 👇
(R&D expense tripled since Dec 2016)
(debt fueled expansion, retained earnings tripled too)
(net property/equipment sideways since 2016)
15,99% S.I.
We'll get into some heavy shorted stocks now.
(Their ENTIRE balance sheet is HORRIBLE!)
(280m revenue, 200m cost of revenue, 250m selling expenses)
(MASSIVE stockbased compensation, 158m in 2020)
17,28% S.I. (Should be more)
THIS company is total trash. Their revenue record is HORRIBLE. No DD was done here at all.
CRISPR Therapeutics AG - 75,61m shares/86,76% float
7,203,391 ARKK/ARKG - 10.98% of float
833.72m value - 8.65B M.C. - 9.64% of cap
Avg.Vol. 7D - 998,707
Avg.Vol. 3M - 2,148,258
P/B 5,08 - 3,69% DtE
2016 N.I.: -$23.2M
2020 N.I.: -$348.9M (cratered)
Cont.👇
(...They have $1,69 BILLION in cash+investments)
(1690m cash, 1828m total assets. Thank you Cathie!)
6,43% S.I.
Teladoc health inc - 154,29m shares/98,86%
13,753,616 ARKK/ARKW/ARKG/ARKF(!!!) - 9,02% of float
2,492.98m value - 28,08B - 8.87% of cap
Avg.Vol. 7D - 2,107,681
Avg.Vol. 3M - 3,629,619
P/B 1.72 - 9,44% DtE
2016 N.I.: -$74.2M
2020 N.I.: -$485.1M (cratered)
Cont. 👇
(Cost of revenues+admin expenses > revenues by ~$183,7m)
8,14% S.I.
While $ARKK is only 24,258.86m in "value" - if you add the value of all these stocks combined across all ETFs, it comes to 11,420.42m. That's 11,4 billion.
NEARLY ALL high risk drug companies.
Now like i said i haven't gone through quarterlies, nor am i a doctor and going through medical trials is not for me.
However, i DO know that those drug trials take ages, even with Phase 3, before stuff is brought to market.
Question is, what are these companies worth NOW?
And right now, every single one's overvalued to the hilt.
EVEN if they don't fail - Some have cash to burn for *years*. They are in *no hurry* to generate revenue anymore.
WHY would i buy *any* of these companies today, rather then in 3 years?
Assuming they're still alive.
And that's not counting trash like Invitae and Pure storage. Some of these companies are already deep in the hole or are giving huge stock compensation. Float's really high on alot of these too.
If they'd made revenues - fine. But NONE are profitable. Not even close
All i see is ill-advised debt fueled expansion without productive assets, zombie companies, High risk pharma plays that may or may not work out, *massive shareholder dilution everywhere* which, as a shareholder, you wanna avoid like the plague.
AND - same names in multiple ETFs.
That oughtta be a crime
Teladoc is owned by FOUR ARK ETFs!!!
Billion and a half in ARKK, billion spread across 3 others.
ANY halfwit can see their selling/admin expenses exceed their gross profits (revenues - cost of revenues), and have since inception. seekingalpha.com/symbol/TDOC/in…
In my opinion, whatever the hell Cathie Wood is thinking, it's dangerous. Systemically dangerous, because if there's even the slightest hint of panic (many of these names have gone down last few months) cause she's found out as completely out of touch, ARKK's gonna go poof.
ARK as an entire investment company failing could be one of the biggest failures of modern history, and definitely would basically send the market into a crash.
And when there is a rout by *everyone else who's still holding float*, ARK's too big to even fit through the door.
She's maneuvered herself into a very dangerous corner, and my advice would be to get some popcorn 🍿
My comment was that a bloomberg terminal is expensive, but spending rent money on options is no problemo.
But that made me think...
Hang on. I've seen news posts before about how options volume has exploded, even exceeded normal share trading. People are ACTUALLY doing it, i'm not just being facetious here.
Now i don't use options myself, but i *have* looked into them.
@MacleodFinance Help me out here. I'm reading more and more that "hyperinflation is defined as 50% a month" - but that's *new*.
Years ago when i looked it up i found "economists don't agree on where it starts, but the general line is 10% a month".
I can't remember *EVER* reading about ANY consensus for the decade i've been studying economy and looking up US financial history and general world economic history.
And i'm sorry, but 50% a month is 600% A YEAR!
I'm pretty sure the common man isn't gonna wait that long.
IMO this is just another warping of the economic language by the establishment.
Hyperinflation *cannot* be defined as having a set boundary, because it's largely *psychological* in nature.
LONG BEFORE you lose 50% of your purchasing power a month are you gonna exit the system!
So there's some confusion between short volume and short interest. I pretty much made the same mistake the first time around, because believe it or not.... there's just a fuckton of data to track at this point.
So, short volume is NOT short interest, but, it does tell us things.
Very simply put, "what isn't there cannot be traded".
This goes for us, as we're literally buying silver to take it off the market. Whatever's part of "market volume" doesn't include *my* PSLV shares, because i'm not actively trading them.