My comment was that a bloomberg terminal is expensive, but spending rent money on options is no problemo.
But that made me think...
Hang on. I've seen news posts before about how options volume has exploded, even exceeded normal share trading. People are ACTUALLY doing it, i'm not just being facetious here.
Now i don't use options myself, but i *have* looked into them.
The reason i don't use them myself is because i consider them unethical according to my strict standards.
Because they don't *mitigate* risk. They Transfer it.
By that i mean, if i buy silver AND gold, i'm hedging silver's volatility with gold's price stability.
(see i understand hedging too).
At the same time, i'm hedging silver's performance with silver's lack-of-performance-relative-to-gold. I'm giving up a bit of THEORETICAL gains for safety. THAT's hedging.
If you buy an option to hedge, *somebody has to >write< that option*.
Meaning if you buy an option to buy $TSLA at $100, somebody else sells you the right to do so.
Meaning, if you *excercise* that option;
>That person HAS to give you a TSLA share!<
They are contractually obligated to do so. Usually this goes unnoticed because of the brokerages.
They'll just cash settle everything on the back end by bunching trades up together, especially if there's no transactional fees. If they don't settle internally.
So that leads to the question... Who actually writes these options? Because that's something i didn't know.
Oh sure i know in the case of big banks it's other big banks and hedgefunds...
...But who's selling to the retail crowd?
I figured Citadel, or there'd be protections atleast. I had read about selling puts and calls myself and decided to stay the fuck away from that danger.
But one doesn't assume. So i simply asked google,
"Who writes robin hood options"
The first post was a hit, and is a good read in itself on what it means to sell an option!
...But i'm a gamer. I'm used to glitching systems, and some stuff... triggers me. Hard.
Like this does:
Oh dear oh fuck oh god oh no.
Cash is the protection?
I can feel this... i can smell this... i can *taste* it.
I had to ask.
Hey Google;
Oh you think the the little subtext does it for me? Nah i have to click on stuff when i'm excited.
And then i read the replies. I've underlined the sentences i focus on, so you get the same experience, from top to bottom:
Yep... yep yep yep.
That's exactly what i was afraid of.
The lesson i learned back in 2008:
Counter. Party. Risk.
Lehman Brothers was such a problem because other banks had loans to Lehman on their balance sheets as assets, rather then liabilities.
When the assets weren't there, banks relying on that credit had to call in other credit lines, which made it impossible for THOSE banks to lend, so THEY called in credit lines etc etc etc.
And this... This is exactly the same structure.
Only this time, DIRECTLY connected to the stock market, rather then being indirectly connected via the banks (which in turn fell because of the housing market).
You starting to get the picture?
And if there's one thing i know about humans....
Y'all motherfuckers not nearly as unique as y'all think.
If Retail is doing this, then it's being done systematically all throughout the system.
Robin Hood hasn't innovated anything except for bringing hedge fund financial WMD's to a bunch of monkeys, and then hide the risks.
That's it.
"Margin-Collateral-Backed Options" are 2008's NINJA loans of 2021.
The moment i read that, my mind IMMEDIATELY flashed back to this moment from one of my favorite movies. Guess which people i think are basically Vlad (RH's CEO):
There are a MASS of people out there who've *sold* calls and puts >on margin and they don't even know<
If the market goes either which way too steeply, in say a March 2020 replay, that 80% options go worthless is going to shift dramatically.
ESPECIALLY on puts.
But a steep rise isn't much better. It'll blow up the calls, ALSO bought on margin.
Remember that Robin Hood suddenly had to raise Billions? Twice? To satisfy margin requirements?
Remember that the Investment Brokers guy said "The entire system nearly collapsed"?
What are the chances THIS is the reason?
What if Wallstreetbets damn near popped the counter party risk bubble?
Because when you think about it, Melvin Capital blowing up fine... But why did RH *itself* almost bite the dust BEFORE WSB got cut off from the spice?
Think about it.
If shares bought on margin, are ALSO collateral for call options...
...That's a >double sale<. TWO people hold TITLE claims:
1. Collateral for Margin. 2. Collateral for Calls.
>TO A SHARE!!!!!<
THAT'S THE THING! Don't focus on the cash cost or the margin.
The point is 2 people have a collateral calls on those shares: 1. The person who bought the call, and 2....
Robin Hood. Because THEY provide the margin.
But again. Systemic behavior.
Is that margin cash that RH owns?
No. it's far too much. So who LENDS them that?
Citadel.
So follow the chain here:
1. Market dips. 2. Puts go ITM unexpectedly. 3. Collateral calls. 4. Puts can't afford shares. 5. Puts take losses, ITM puts take losses. 6. RH's OWN collateral evaporates. 7. RH goes broke 8. Citadel has to >write down< the margin loans.
9. Citadel is as overleveraged as the banks in 2008 were, because OF COURSE THEY ARE THE ENTIRE FUCKING SYSTEM'S CHOKING ON LEVERAGE! 10. Citadel has to sell to make collateral calls. 11. EVERY TIME YOU READ "COLLATERAL CALL", READ: SELLING ASSETS INTO THE OPEN MARKET!
12. Selling begets selling begets selling. 13. More puts go ITM. 14. More collateral calls. 15. More non-existant collateral. 16. Etc.
The investment brokers guy wasn't lying. The system REALLY damn near died.
@MacleodFinance Help me out here. I'm reading more and more that "hyperinflation is defined as 50% a month" - but that's *new*.
Years ago when i looked it up i found "economists don't agree on where it starts, but the general line is 10% a month".
I can't remember *EVER* reading about ANY consensus for the decade i've been studying economy and looking up US financial history and general world economic history.
And i'm sorry, but 50% a month is 600% A YEAR!
I'm pretty sure the common man isn't gonna wait that long.
IMO this is just another warping of the economic language by the establishment.
Hyperinflation *cannot* be defined as having a set boundary, because it's largely *psychological* in nature.
LONG BEFORE you lose 50% of your purchasing power a month are you gonna exit the system!
So there's some confusion between short volume and short interest. I pretty much made the same mistake the first time around, because believe it or not.... there's just a fuckton of data to track at this point.
So, short volume is NOT short interest, but, it does tell us things.
Very simply put, "what isn't there cannot be traded".
This goes for us, as we're literally buying silver to take it off the market. Whatever's part of "market volume" doesn't include *my* PSLV shares, because i'm not actively trading them.
With 28k on the docket, probably reducing to -19,5k/-20k on the final report, they're about 10k away from their previous high, with today and tomorrow to go to roll over.
WHATEVER OPEN INTEREST IS LEFT ON THE 25TH, STANDS FOR DELIVERY!
Today, the 24th, is of the biggest import.
As i said, the biggest rollover day happens 2-3 days before the end. We just had it.
Under normal circumstances, i would imagine anywhere between 3 to 8k rollover today and then 2-3k tomorrow, putting final delivery around 15k - Quite substantial but probably not enough.
THIS IS NOT FINANCIAL ADVICE! I say this because i've never done this before; And i wanna see if i can find absolute dogshit at or near the top as good as i find absolute gold at the bottom, based on fundamentals alone.
AND THE TICKER IS 🥁
$IRM
As you can see, 1,100%+ debt to equity is quite excessive. Combined with my favorite measure, Book value per share, at an eye popping -16.8, i decided to immediately take a closer look. Especially at $32.26 a share! This is no penny stock.
There's more that didn't line up.
Market cap is $9,27 billion, but enterprise value is $20,27 billion. This is quite a spread, and usually indicates undervalue (which is how i got attracted to it in the first place).
However. P/E ratio is 69.91!
Now they can't both be right. There's gotta be a reason.
77 shadowcontracts, meaning +385,000 ounces found and put up for delivery *this month*, before the delivery wall hits in just a few days. Calendar says "last day of delivery 26th of February" - these ounces will be delivered by then
Preliminary rollover of -10,8k which'll go up to ~-11,5k in the final report. I've seen these numbers before and it was expected, the question is, is that gonna happen more?
To hit the previous record of ~16k, they need to shed another ~32k contracts in 4 days.