#ivermectin does not work.
1/Ther is more than meets the eye.
This paper was first sent 2 @FrontiersIn special issue
But issued a rejection after they identified “series of strong, unsupported claims” in paper as it "didnt offer an objective nor balanced scientific contribution
1/Ther is more than meets the eye.
This paper was first sent 2 @FrontiersIn special issue
But issued a rejection after they identified “series of strong, unsupported claims” in paper as it "didnt offer an objective nor balanced scientific contribution
https://twitter.com/doc_zubin/status/1391048113742221318
2/
Read the Chief Editor Frederick Fenter's media statement on the same
blog.frontiersin.org/2021/03/02/2-m…
The paper made series of strong, unsupported claims based on studies with insufficient statistical significance, and at times, without the use of control groups.
#COVID19
Read the Chief Editor Frederick Fenter's media statement on the same
blog.frontiersin.org/2021/03/02/2-m…
The paper made series of strong, unsupported claims based on studies with insufficient statistical significance, and at times, without the use of control groups.
#COVID19
3/
Further, authors promoted their own specific #ivermectin treatment wich was inappropriate 4 a systematic review/metanalysis article. This paper does not follow @PRISMAStatement guidelines prisma-statement.org
Authors missed astute risk of bias/heterogeinity assessments
Further, authors promoted their own specific #ivermectin treatment wich was inappropriate 4 a systematic review/metanalysis article. This paper does not follow @PRISMAStatement guidelines prisma-statement.org
Authors missed astute risk of bias/heterogeinity assessments
4/
Authors reviewed pooled metanalysis frm their own biased website that does not consider proper inclusions and exclusion. There is no PRISMA flow study followed. It is a TERRIBLE paper. They incluced observational trials along with RCTs to prove a point. Thats just bad science.
Authors reviewed pooled metanalysis frm their own biased website that does not consider proper inclusions and exclusion. There is no PRISMA flow study followed. It is a TERRIBLE paper. They incluced observational trials along with RCTs to prove a point. Thats just bad science.
5/
These are elements required for metanalysis/syst review prisma-statement.org/documents/PRIS…
C hw much they screwed up in methodology. There is NO: search strategy/selection process/data collection steps/risk of bias assesment/systhesis methods/reporting bias/certainity assesment
Pathetic.
These are elements required for metanalysis/syst review prisma-statement.org/documents/PRIS…
C hw much they screwed up in methodology. There is NO: search strategy/selection process/data collection steps/risk of bias assesment/systhesis methods/reporting bias/certainity assesment
Pathetic.
5/
the-scientist.com/news-opinion/f…
This is actually #ivermectincult FLCCC's own webpage based 'reviews' of studies wich included PREPRINTS with lot of bias/risks for inclusion into a good meta-analysis. Meta-analysis is as gud as the studies included. This 1 FAILS by a LONG margin.
the-scientist.com/news-opinion/f…
This is actually #ivermectincult FLCCC's own webpage based 'reviews' of studies wich included PREPRINTS with lot of bias/risks for inclusion into a good meta-analysis. Meta-analysis is as gud as the studies included. This 1 FAILS by a LONG margin.
6/
Bcoz they didnt hav any better options as FLCCC group know that its a biased paper, AJT ultimately tuk it, for brownie points on citation. Only a matter of time, wen a letter to editor/proper critique will send this to hell.
@ronaklmno @pash22 @GorwayGlobal @Neurophysik
Bcoz they didnt hav any better options as FLCCC group know that its a biased paper, AJT ultimately tuk it, for brownie points on citation. Only a matter of time, wen a letter to editor/proper critique will send this to hell.
@ronaklmno @pash22 @GorwayGlobal @Neurophysik
You can actually see how insecure the FLCCC is becoz they did not waste anytime in putting up this 'accepted article' all over their website and social media handles and news - for them to get the required (false) credibility. They R just a bunch of glorified cultist #quacks.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
