#Antivax narratives actively harm the voices of the legit vaccine injured.

Antivaxxers fuel fear, take stories out of context, and encourage others to not get vaccinated. this means the vaccine injured (who may not be able to get boosters) are now less protected by herd immunity
There is a cruel irony that antivaxxers often shout about side effects being hidden, but they are the ones driving some of the silence. When a study comes out (e.g. the viral vector blood clots) and...
it gets pounced on my conspiracy bullshit, taken wildly out of context, spun into something it isn't, and drives people away from a safe and effective public health measure, why the fuck do you think some people don't want to talk openly about these things?!
i've seen a fair few pretty suss examples where it looks like an antivaxxer has made up stories of a vaccine injury(ies). This de-legitimises the actually injured's stories and does not support the alleged cause of open and honest discourse
because of antivax bullshit, i imagine a few legitimate vaccine injured voices have probably been taken the wrong way by vaccine advocates (who can be equally as aggressive). this also fuels silence from individuals.

in short:...
let scientists & legit patients lead convos on vax side fx
dont extrapolate from cases
understand individuals are different to populations when it comes to risk
learn that your voice is not always important & shutting up may be the best thing
dont make shit up
stay in your lane
NOTES:
1. luckily, despite the nonsense, a lot of time & resources are going into understanding rare side effects of the vaccines, these are being reported openly & widely, & these key messages are trickling through to policy (e.g. changing the age recommendation for AZ vaccine)
2. if you think the above is in any way heartless, you do not understand my point. lots of drugs seriously do not work well for some ppl: tramadol slams my blood pressure to the floor; some people are allergic to antibiotics; anaesthesia can kill; others cant even take ibuprofen
this isn't unique to pharma drugs either: weed makes me want to vomit, MDMA can cause heart problems; alcohol toxicity can kill etc. to suggest no one should be taking these drugs because a minority of people react badly would be ridiculous
(exercise can cause injuries and kill too)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Harriet Carroll: To be decided...

Harriet Carroll: To be decided... Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @angryhacademic

17 Dec
something #academics i think dont want to admit when it comes to marking #student work:
you quite often just *know* what the mark is & this seems to be quite reliable between markers
no amount of rubrics can define this & often these trap markers into box-ticking
#AcademicTwitter
would you agree?

i hate having to justify my mark based on a rubric; it is usually obvious who is a upper/middle/lower 1st, 2:1, 2:2, 3rd, or fail.

obvs the issue is bias without something "objective" but...
...i don't think the objectivity line helps as we just end up fitting our mark into the rubric rather than letting the rubric define the mark
Read 6 tweets
17 Dec
nice article about pilot studies:
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/artic…

i think a lot of people see pilot studies as "mini" studies, but this can be misleading.

tl;dr: pilot studies primarily test study feasibility; they do NOT *test* hypotheses

#AcademicTwitter #research #Science
key aims of a pilot study include (depending on the study):
☑️checking the feasibility of the protocol
☑️work out finer details (e.g. dosage, type of placebo/control)
☑️assess randomisation/blinding/etc procedures
☑️refine participant-facing documentation (e.g. consent form, information sheet, etc)
☑️refine study-related documentation (etc) (e.g. finding data entry issues)
☑️understand likely drop-out/retention
Read 4 tweets
19 Nov
something i think doctors don't always appreciate:
diagnoses are important to patients, even if there's no treatment

🧵

#MedTwitter #chronicillness #DisabilityRights
im sure there's other reasons but key things overall i think are:
1. a diagnosis gives you limits - what treatment can and can't be tried, what can trigger things, what's the prognosis, etc
2. it gives patients a community - there's tonnes of groups for people with all kinds of ailments, conditions, illnesses, disabilities. being able to talk to someone with a shared experience helps make everything less shit
Read 12 tweets
18 Nov
As some of you know im suffering weird #neurological symptoms atm. The last week has been pretty awful. One of the weirder symptoms is called micrographia: writing getting smaller and smaller.
↙️ My writing on Tuesday (bad not awful day)
My writing on Wednesday (awful day) ↘️ The words: corporate → research & development Location: coThe words: brief [blanked out] on extension Written in small
Micrographia in itself *can* be an early sign of conditions like #Parkinsons

In patients with Parkinsons, closing their eyes whilst writing can often help mitigate micrographia
(in my case the rapid onset followed by rapid improvement makes me think / hope its just whatever the fuck is going on with my neuro-immunology not a sign of whats to come...😬)
Read 5 tweets
7 Dec 20
during my #PhD, i conducted a side project investigating what the barriers are towards making changes to the #academicpublishing system to reduce publication #bias

journals.plos.org/plosone/articl…

this showed me a rather dark side to #academia... 1/8

#AcademicTwitter #phdlife
i got about 50:50 praise and hate for this. weirdly enough, the praise and hate were often about the same thing: the (early) stage of my career.

praise: "it's great you're so keen and have grasped key issues and taken action so early..." 2/8
hate: "you're too early in your career and naïve to understand these issues. you shouldn't be researching this"

more worryingly, whilst i did get a lot of this feedback in person/by email, some of it was BEHIND MY BACK to my colleagues 3/8
Read 10 tweets
11 Nov 20
ok i've used R now for about 10 hours so im definitely suitably enough experienced to say i hate it, its a big pile of shit, i dont know why this is what is popular, and i wish i had access to stata again. WAHHHHH
im sure people can tell me a million reasons why R is great. sorry to say: YOU'RE WRONG.
i will delete these tweets in a few weeks when it finally clicks and i think R is brilliant like everyone else does
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(