ok i've used R now for about 10 hours so im definitely suitably enough experienced to say i hate it, its a big pile of shit, i dont know why this is what is popular, and i wish i had access to stata again. WAHHHHH
im sure people can tell me a million reasons why R is great. sorry to say: YOU'RE WRONG.
i will delete these tweets in a few weeks when it finally clicks and i think R is brilliant like everyone else does
its like whatever i ask it to do it seems to think there's no dataset and it can't find the variable. THE DATASET IS OPEN BRO. 😭😭😭
i copy code, change the variables names and Error Error Error. WHYYYY
Ok after much stress and a trump-esque tantrum i managed to run 4 PLS-DAs (hopefully correctly). I still hate R though. Hmmph
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
when it comes to engaging #STEM#academics (an essential task in order to gain max momentum to tackle problems like #casualisation), i think 1 difficulty is that #activism uses a lot of logical fallacies. this makes taking action appear irrational 1/15
identifying an issue (e.g. casualisation) and claiming it impacts other issues (e.g. mental health problems) = potential false cause, and/or hasty generalisation fallacy
making broad statements (e.g. gender pay gap is a real problem) = ambiguity fallacy
3/15
i promised in this thread i'd offer an idea of an alternative #academic#publishing model, so here it is. be prepared, changing to this would require some seriously radical change... 1/17
il do this comparison with the last paper i got formally accepted to a journal as these 2 co-occured so there's no "time effect" or anything as a confounder. (JP = journal publishing; PP = preprint publishing) 2/9
JP: rejected 6 times (i think); 3 were editorial rejections *explicitly* mentioning the null findings as a reason for rejection
PP: paper is out there open for anyone to openly critique and i welcome this 3/9
(i still have a few collaborative papers to write and these will be published properly for the benefit of my co-authors)
i will soon publish a paper on a pre-print server, with no intention of submitting to an academic journal. my reasons for this are manifold 2/38
1. #academia is inherently corrupt & the publication model facilitates this:
- unpaid labour (editors, peer-reviewers,& authors [ok, they do get paid by the uni which oft = public funds yet journals privately profit & we see none of this unlike other forms of publishing]) 3/38
for those who missed my @aberdeen_ucu talk today on #sugar, #breakfast, #health & #appetite, a wee thread on the fascinating properties of sugar...
full talk (poor sound qual) can be found here:
1/21
#sugar is demonised in the media, literally described as "evil". myths include: its addictive, causes cravings, makes you hungry, makes you overeat, makes you gain weight.
current #publichealth guidelines target reducing sugar
2/21
#breakfast is touted the "most important" meal of the day. what does "important" mean?
breakfast is the highest #sugar meal of the day so a good meal to target to reduce total sugar.
breakfast = complex to define, but broadly breaks the overnight fast (break-fast) 3/21