1/ I did my early career in applied economic research with a focus on East. Europe. Everything I saw was about helping former Eastern bloc nations to modernise and become prosperous. Russia, too, benefitted from enormous generosity from the West at its time of greatest distress.
2/ Russia had a miserable time in the 90s because it spent decades pursuing ridiculous economic policies while also holding down a gigantic empire and a gigantic military machine. It then chose to collapse its own empire, and of course everybody who could made a run for it.
3/ While some Russians were learning humility, a deeply resentful, violent, and criminally-minded set of elites took back control in 1999 following a palace coup and what appeared to be false-flag terrorist attacks against their own civilian population.
4/ The Putin regime from the very beginning built its power and legitimacy on war - the second Chechen War. Economically, the regime was lucky, by 1999, some reforms had been enacted, the worst of the transitional recession was over - and the oil price picked up. They got lucky.
5/ At every turn, Western governments went out of their way to help Russia economically, markets opened up, Russia was admitted to the WTO, European companies jostled to buy Russian energy products and to invest deep inside Russia.
6/ Foolish notions were applied equally to Russia and to China - the very vague and hopeful idea that economic engagement would lead to democratic transformation. That assumption was sacrosanct from the early 1990s until well into the 2010s.
This was a disastrously wrong idea.
7/ The insight that economic support and openness towards a large dictatorship is foolish might be one of the rare points of agreement between hard realists such as Mearsheimer, and advocates of liberal democracy. The West pursued this deeply flawed policy for 30 years.
8/ For reasons that are now all too evident, it is insanity to help the likes of Russia and China become richer. They will use the proceeds to become military threats. This has already happened. The data is in. The demonstration is done.
9/ And yet even now, on the brink of a large war in Europe, with rising tensions in Asia and a burgeoning Moscow-Beijing relationship, our nations balk at the notion of economic decoupling. We keep on feeding both the bear and the dragon, and we are less and less secure.
10/ One could understand this if it were part of an overall strategy to secure gains from trade while also financing robust defence & security goals.
Instead, we have a short-sighted protection of trade and investment interests without proper investments in defence & security.
11/ It is past time that Western governments, most of all the governments of Western Europe, get serious about their military capabilities, and about making it much harder for Russia and China to develop and finance the means to coerce us. END.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Edward Hunter Christie

Edward Hunter Christie Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EHunterChristie

Feb 21
1 - For a stronger West - thread
Although the emotional states of *some* of our leaders are adequately heightened, the policy responses discussed so far - #sanctions, new #NATO battle groups - are much too weak to respond to the enormity of the challenge to our way of life
2 - The prospective #Russian invasion of #Ukraine should be compared to the invasion of #Poland in 1939. Consider #Ukraine's size, a larger territory than #France, a larger pop. than #Poland. Consider #China and the axis of the two enormous dictatorships.
3 - I am not forecasting a genocide or a world war, but we are at the point of gravest danger for Western civilisation since, I would argue, the *early* Cold War (or the 1930s). And yet look at #Europe, our #military capabilities and investments are ridiculous.
Read 12 tweets
Feb 20
1/ On #sanctions and #Russia. Nothing in the package has a characteristic of a "bomb", they are rather like flames. The longer they hold the more they hurt, and if lifted, they cease to hurt and most of the damage is lifted.
Apply them now, lift if behavioural improvement.
2/ Big difference btw deterrence and leverage. Best deterrent causes acute damage once, like a military strike. Best leverage is enduring damage over time.
Sanctions = leverage, not deterrence.
Forget trigger condition. Formulate condition for lifting.
3/
a/ If RU seeks imperial restoration and confrontation (assumption), sanction now and further measures later for our security & defence capabilities.
b/ If RU has minor Ukraine objective but wants business w. EU (alt assumption), then sanctions now, RU will change behaviour.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 28
1/ Interesting to see West. journalists and Pres Zelensky not understanding each other. Tension btw the Western mind that seeks a "single truth", e.g. mass invasion in X days (and if not, loss of interest, confusion). And Ukrainian experience of permanent war and threat of war.
2/ Zelensky is asking for money bc RU war against UA is also a permanent economic war, a war of destabilisation, internal subversion, political manipulation - plus cyber-attacks, sabotage attacks, actual combat in Donbas, provocations on LOC...
3/ Plus recurrent threats of Blitzkrieg style invasion, and note, this was also the case in 2014, and it is again now. Every time, it could be invasion. Every time, it could be a coup. And all the time, the Kremlin's goal is permanently to bully and undermine and coerce...
Read 11 tweets
Jan 27
1/ On the "energy transition" and geoeconomics:
My experience, including e.g. lobbying for #electrification of #transport before it was cool, is that govts prefer the path of least resistance, which helps the incumbent #oil and #gas industry.
2/ So what you get is a compromise of #green policy goals (lower CO2, but not too fast, plus nuclear exit), slow-exiting of #oil and increase in #gas (good for incumbent industry), promotion of #hydrogen (helps gas industry survive), and of course #Russia.
3/ Liberal economic principles, and foreign policy idealism, are brought in just in time to prevent heavy geoeconomic measures to cut dependence on Russia. And so, Europe will do a slow energy transition with Russia guaranteed major benefits for the next few decades.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 27
1/ Posting same video shared by @andersostlund earlier. Worth watching. The @CDU spox is very good. But even the @spdde spox sounds quite reasonable. However I fully disagree on the logic of not delivering weapons...

ardmediathek.de/video/phoenix-…
2/ ...the reasoning (or pretext) now given by @spdde is that GER shouldn't deliver weapons because it is a facilitator in negotiations. Well at least there's no longer a clumsy argument about history. Nonetheless the new argument is poor logic...
3/ ...delivering weapons to #Ukraine would strengthen GER credibility and put Moscow on the backfoot - if even SPD types give weapons, that means #Kremlin has gone too far. Also, @spdde argues that GER is helping UA in other ways, esp economically...
Read 5 tweets
Jan 26
@ulrichspeck 1/ I think German "geopolitics" would be a disaster given the blind spots of many German elites - e.g. taking the EU market for granted, therefore being soft on Moscow & Beijing. That is a geopolitics of a certain kind. What makes the West tick is something else...
2/ What is more-or-less unique about America today - and the British Empire before WW2 - was that in spite of a lot of hard power politics, both at times mobilised power to impose positive change elsewhere, rather than choose the path of least resistance...
3/ Take for instance the Royal Navy's leadership in interdicting the slave trade in the 19th century - and of salient interest to all Europeans, the choices made by London and then far more importantly by Washington to confront totalitarianism...
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(