We're seeing increasingly heavy shelling of residential areas in #Ukarine. Alongside the massive civilian costs of the use of explosive force in cities, we also need to consider how this indiscriminate practice impacts the environment, and as a result, human health. 🧵🔽 1/x
2/x When buildings are hit, building materials are pulverised, generating large volumes of dust. PBM dusts are typically a heterogeneous mixture of materials, such as cement, metals, PCBs, silica, asbestos and other synthetic fibres. ceobs.org/conflict-rubbl…
3/x In spite of this being an issue in every conflict where heavy weapons are used in populated areas, research on these dusts and exposures is largely absent, as with most chronic health exposures linked to conflict.
4/x Urban warfare creates vast quantities of debris. This is often contaminated with UXO but also with whatever was in the buildings, could be houses, could be commercial, could be light industrial. How you deal with it matters for the environment. unep.org/news-and-stori…
5/x This is why, together with partners, we have been advocating for the current political process on #EWIPA to address the environment. #Ukraine is a further reminder of why indiscriminate shelling of towns and cities is so abhorrent ceobs.org/we-must-not-ig…
While attention has focused on the safety of the design of PWR reactors at #Zaporizhzhia NPP after last night's attack by #Russia and the fire, we also need to take the volume of radioactive waste stored at the site into account. 🧵⬇️ 1/x #Ukraine
As @friends_earth noted in 2015 “With a war around the corner, it is shocking that the spent fuel rod containers are standing under the open sky, with just a metal gate and some security guards waltzing up and down for protection.” ourworld.unu.edu/en/nuclear-was… 2/x
As of 2015, "more than 3,000 spent #nuclear fuel rods are kept inside metal casks within towering concrete containers in an open-air yard close to a perimeter fence at #Zaporizhia." 3/x
For more insights on how the #Ukraine invasion is impacting wheat exports, and the implications of that for #FoodSecurity and political stability in the MENA and elsewhere.
Disputed claims from #Russia and #Ukraine over control of the Zaporizhzhia #Nuclear plant (and its 6 reactors). In welcome move Ukraine formally requesting @iaeaorg oversight of #Chernobyl zone occupied by Russia
1/x Concerned over reports that fighting may focus on #Mariupol today. The city is home to at least 56 industrial enterprises, including the massive Avostal and Ilyich iron and steel works, plus many other chemical and engineering enterprises. #Ukraine
2/x #Mariupol already has some of the worst air quality problems in #Ukraine and Europe because of these industrial activities. If heavy weapons are used, we may see fires at sensitive sites, pollution and damage to pollution prevention infrastructure. nationalgeographic.com/environment/ar…
3/x #AirQuality monitoring stations in #Mariupol have been offline since the 23/24 Feb. Serious pollution incidents linked to the fighting will add to the health burden its residents already face, and may leave a lasting legacy. #Ukrainesaveecobot.com/en/maps/mariup…
#Military emissions make a significant contribution to #ClimateChange, our new blog explores why this is and what needs to change. A lack of transparency means we don't know how large their contribution is but we do have some stats⬇️ ceobs.org/the-militarys-…#ClimateAction 1/6
Global military expenditure rose to almost US$2 trillion in 2020, this is important for military emissions because a large proportion are indirect and come through supply chains and lifecycle costs. Here's a chart. It's really not all about emissions from engines. 2/6
Which isn't to say that engines don't matter. As of 2021 the global #military aircraft fleet is 53,563, which is double the projected civilian fleet (23,715). But because the military don't report where they fly and how much fuel they use we don't know what it contributes. 3/6
In focusing on the security risks of #ClimateChange have we neglected to ask how conflicts affect emissions? Our new overview explores how the environmental and social changes that occur in war influence emissions, and why we need to track them ceobs.org/how-does-war-c… 🔽 1/7
The direct emissions in conflict are the most obvious, for example attacks on oil infrastructure, or scorched earth policies. But we also see significant changes to land use that have a major bearing on whether areas store or release carbon. 2/7
Peace can also generate emissions, we almost always see spikes in deforestation, and we need to factor in the emissions costs of managing conflict debris and of reconstruction. Conflicts impede environmental governance, which also has a bearing on emissions. 3/7 #EWIPA