#Ukraine is weathering significant attrition in the battle to defend #Severodonesk in the #Donbas.

Given the losses in lives and the relatively static front line, some are beginning to dismay that perhaps the tide is turning to #Russia.

That could happen. But it hasn't yet. 1/
#Ukraine is still winning the war strategically. It survives as a state & a people & has secured its capital. It has denied #Putin his ambition to seize the entire country & has forced Putin to fight extremely hard for a limited goal of seizing the Donbas, at which he may fail 2/
Operationally, Ukraine is nearing a grinding stalemate in the East. As we @TheStudyofWar warned in March, stalemates are bloody & dynamic at the tactical level. This is already on display in the brutal attrition battle for incremental advances in #Severodonesk 3/
Operational stalemate would not mean the tide is turning toward #Russia, however.

Fighting the Russian army to an effective standstill in the Donbas would be a huge victory for #Ukraine

It raises an important point regarding what success looks like as the war changes 4/
Ukrainian victory in this phase of the war wont look like the repulsion of Russian forces back to the border from #Kyiv

Russian forces have learned & regrouped. Putin clearly expects them to take the Donbas even at astronomical cost = far different from expectations in Kyiv. 5/
These factors matter. The initial shock of Ukraine's fierce defense has worn off. While Russian forces cannot fully overcome initial failures in their structure, preparation, etc they have settled in for an intentional & vicious battle of attrition. 6/
Unless Russian forces are destroyed (so damaged they cannot fight) or suffer a rout (disorderly collapse), they are unlikely to be repelled akin to Kyiv.

Instead, Ukraine wins by retaking its territory by force. Sometimes one village at a time. 7/
Forcing a halt to Russian offensive operations in the East (even a stalemate) would buy time for #Ukraine to regroup, rearm, & prepare a counteroffensive

The US & NATO should surge support to ensure it does halt Russian gains & can reset quickly for a counteroffensive 8/
In the south, the war has already entered the next phase. Ukraine has forced a limit of advance upon Russian forces & begun counterattacks

More importantly, #Ukraine is setting conditions via partisan warfare behind the front lines to destabilize Russian control 9/
This partisan activity in southern #Ukraine looks increasingly coordinated & could --> a coherent campaign to erode Russian control, impose costs that attrite Russian capability & will, & foster resistance. These effects support future counterattacks to reclaim terrain. 10/
By tying up so much of his force in the fight for the #Donbas, #Putin has taken a risk in occupied #Kherson. One the Ukrainians are exploiting (as well as shaping by fighting hard to delay in #Severodonesk) 11/
Does that mean #Ukraine will win? It surely means they have a shot. Even now. And especially if they preserve the will - and America and NATO do the same. 12/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jennifer Cafarella

Jennifer Cafarella Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JennyCafarella

Mar 20
#Ukraine defeated the initial phase of #Russia’s invasion.

On what basis can/should we evaluate Ukraine’s success or failure in this war?

This thread will unpack a few key concepts & arguments

1/
Some point to the siege & bombardment of Ukrainian cities & say this isnt “winning”. We feel it. Deeply.

But evaluating outcomes in war requires a careful analytic framework

We must study the interaction between 2 military campaigns: #Russia’s offense & #Ukraine’s defense

2/
#Russia invaded #Ukraine in order to conquer it. Ukraine is fighting a war of self-defense for its continued existence as a state.

Big picture, Ukraine succeeds or fails based on whether it emerges from this war intact. I’d argue that includes all territory (#Crimea)

3/
Read 10 tweets
Mar 6
What does Russian "control" of terrain in #Ukraine mean & what are its limits?

Our team @TheStudyofWar & @criticalthreats is mapping Russian advances & publishing these daily.

This thread will unpack our methodology & explain how to read these maps.

1/
Good questions are emerging as anti-Russia activity erupts behind the front line / in areas Russian forces "control"

For ex: should maps only show military infrastructure & roads?

Not if you seek to understand maneuver war as Russia is waging it.



2/
Our @TheStudyofWar @criticalthreats map uses a standard military approach to map conventional maneuver war, which is what #Russia is waging

In doctrine, "control" does not mean the complete elimination of resistance in an area. That would mean "clearing" an area (FM 3-90-1)

3/
Read 9 tweets
Dec 2, 2019
NEW | #Russia's Dead-End Diplomacy in #Syria

My latest @TheStudyofWar w/ Jason Zhou covers:

-A complex power balance b/t #Assad & his backers
-Evolution of Russia's integrated military & diplomatic efforts
-Russian limits in Syria
-A way forward

bit.ly/37X4xLH

1/
@TheStudyofWar A meaningful diplomatic settlement in #Syria remains distant despite consistent US efforts to support one

America's core mistake is repeatedly expecting that #Russia can & will solve our #Assad problem(s)

It is a mental block we must overcome to have a more effective policy

2/
@TheStudyofWar Since 2015, #Russia has failed to achieve 5 major diplomatic goals on the heels of military success. Most often, #Assad has spoiled

1. 2017 Astana
2. 2018 Sochi
3. 2018 reconciliation deals
4. Reconstruction $ for refugee returns
5. Reconstruction $ for Idlib de-escalation

3/
Read 14 tweets
Oct 21, 2019
Thoughts on the option to retain a few hundred US troops in Deir ez Zour

Mission is still counter-#ISIS but the policy concerns include preventing #Iran, #Assad, & #Russia from seizing the oil fields. Our presence has (so far) had that secondary effect

So what can ~200 guys do?
~200 guys at best gives us a foothold & preserves:

-intel --> high value strikes on #ISIS & #AlQaeda
-some tribal support. At minimum ability to compete 4 it
-some kinetic ability to defend vs #Assad,#Iran,#Russia expansion
-option 2 surge forces again

NOT a long term solution
A small presence of ~200 guys essentially means a single US base in Deir ez Zour. It does not enable us to secure all of the oil fields. The #SDF would be responsible for securing that infrastructure, with - in theory - air and artillery support from our limited residual force
Read 14 tweets
Oct 17, 2019
Turkey confirms it will stop shooting if the #YPG surrenders

And apparently that's a ceasefire
Oh Turkey clarifies it is not, in fact, a ceasefire

But if the #YPG surrenders to this non-ceasefire, the US will not impose sanctions on Turkey

Read 18 tweets
Oct 13, 2019
They are almost certainly leaving the country entirely. US forces depend on a ground supply line via Faysh Khabur in the far northeast, so we cannot withdraw southward into Deir ez Zour Province and sustain that presence
A sustainable presence in Deir ez Zour would require a new logistics train from Iraq, probably by air. By land would require traversing lots of terrain that we can't secure from #Iran's proxies.
I think at best a withdrawal south of the M4 highway would be a bid for time
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(