of *course* @sama's fake ChatGPT miracle relies upon an army of underpaid workers just out of sight! of _course_ it does! this is the work of modern #programmers, people without any known sense of ethics—and people stupid enough to believe their own lies.
the corporate #AI debacle deserves a proper dissection. the situation is appalling: people like @sama and @demishassabis make promises about their marvellous universal thinking machines that are *just shy* of outright fraud. and they program the machines with their own inanity.
that's the real problem here: @sama and @fchollet and all the other computer technicians who make grandiose promises and proclamations about #AI and "intelligence" are, to put the matter bluntly, completely incompetent at judging *anyone's* intellect, least of all their own.
they are people of exceedingly specialized and narrow expertise, and yet they pretend to be generalists? why? because #AI / #AGI is sold as the ultimate generalist.
but @fchollet, @sama, &c. aren't capable of telling good material from bad—in general, #computer programmers are hopelessly ignorant and inept at all fields outside their limited domain. but they've convinced themselves their ignorance doesn't matter—their machines are "better".
but that's the problem. *how would they know 'better'?*
can @sama or @JeffDean, or any of the other superficial computer nerds who hopes to make a fortune by selling "artificially intelligent" software be trusted to know _anything_ that's not computer programming? anything?
I assert that the answer to this question is "no". @sama, @fchollet, &c. are not fit judges of knowledge outside their technical specialty.
they would have *no idea* whether their #AI / #MachineLearning tools were doing a good job of learning—they, themselves, *don't learn*.
they all *think* they've somehow gained mastery of every subject, but ask @sama or @fchollet any tough questions about any subject or field that's not their specialty—then it's easy to learn just how superficial their knowledge is. they have a Cliff's Notes grasp on the world.
and these are the people who say they're going to deliver us a universal thinking machine, good for all purposes. why you can even pay a sum of money for a robotic version of Winston Churchill, one who (like @bindelj or @Docstockk) has been programmed to deny British genocides.
the #AI crowd offer #capitalism no less than the erasure of history—the embodiment of legends and propaganda in programmatic form—the rejection of the inconvenient world of verifiable and material facts.
well done, @sama &c. you've found a way to destroy the *past*.
~Mona
and you'll be remembered for this achievement, @sama. oh yes. you have in fact made yourself famous.
I will make very sure of your fame, in fact—if nobody else does it first.
ah, here it is! we were trying to remember this: the tweet in which @fchollet eloquently demonstrated their incompetence at understanding how perception works, on a fundamental level.
this mountebank thinks that expectation precedes perception.
to put it more bluntly, @fchollet thinks that perceiving things starts with knowing what you want to perceive first. there's a word for this sort of perception: it's called BIAS. Chollet has, in his tweet, described *perceptual bias*: applying filters to one's perceptions.
(2/x)
why would @fchollet make such an elementary blunder? well, likely Chollet (in common with most #computer professionals these days) is hideously biased about most things. the high-tech field, especially in the higher echelons of management, is sodden with bias and bıgotry.
we in the Pnictogen Wing are perhaps nearly alone in thinking that "flat-Earth" people, i.e. human beings who cling to the notion that the Earth is not a spheroid but instead a disc, are not totally pointless.
flat-Earthers are, for most of Western society, safe targets.
(1/x)
for that reason alone, we are drawn to try understanding the phenomenon better, rather than simply discard flat-Earthism and its adherents as worthless and laughable.
what drives a person to endorse such a quixotic worldview, one that insures their permanent ostracism?
(2/x)
there's emotional benefits to belonging in a mostly-despised faction, of course. the faction experiences so much pressure from outside, the society *inside* the bubble is practically forced to be orderly and well-disclipined—a safe haven from an otherwise chaotic world.
#capitalism is essentially *backwards* looking. yes, capitalists attempt to pretend that they're the masters of #innovation and advancement of #technology, the builders of the #future, and all that.
it's lies—mere #marketing. capitalists do not like progress or change.
(1/x)
corporate #management and #executive persons want one thing above all others: guaranteed #money. they want *safe bets*. they don't want #competition or #risk; they want a steady source of "passive income" that always goes up and up.
(yes, I know that #capitalism and the #business community, not to mention all #politics and #journalism these days, blame #inflation on the profligate #consumer—but in reality, inflation occurs because capitalists always want *more #money*; it has to come from somewhere.)
#Christians and #Christianity are infamously *randy* and sex-obsessed, and it's difficult to accept that this fact is widely grasped and understood, yet it's still socially forbidden to bring it up. it's *rude* to point out too loudly that Christians are fixated on sex.
(1/x)
in the #Bible Belt of America, churches exist cheek-by-jowl with porn shops—American #Christians consume more pornography than the rest of America, and engage in enthusiastic commerce for the satisfaction of their sexual pleasures.
and they can't stop talking about it.
(2/x)
one senses that they *speak from experience*. reactionary right-wing #Christians of the @dalepartridge / @MattWalshBlog sort love blithering about the evils of fleshly pleasures in such a way that lets us know, they're thinking about these things a lot. they are *tempted*.
one of the most curious stories that came out during the 2016 campaign, during which the inept candidacy of @HillaryClinton succumbed to the neo-fascıst movement and @mtaibbi's best friend @realDonaldTrump, was this act of petty corporate theft.
Trump, or rather his tax-shelter @TrumpFoundation (every rich #entrepreneur-criminal has a "foundation" of some sort, useful both for tax purposes and as a place to furnish sinecure jobs to cousins and loyal toadies and so on), was accused of fiddling money from a charity.
(2/x)
@realDonaldTrump's @GOP defenders (*not* including @mtaibbi, whose fandom for Trump and the GOP was predictably late in developing) tried to pretend that Trump or his people couldn't have possibly done such a thing: after all, Trump's already rich! on paper, anyway.
none of us in the Pnictogen Wing is an expert in semiotics—that's the academic discipline pertaining to the study and meaning of *symbolism*. but we feel that we've been forced to take an amateur interest in the field mostly because *symbols* are much abused and exploited.
right-wing frauds like @jordanbpeterson and @ConceptualJames have done a land-office business in pretending to be experts in symbolism.
political ideologues, particularly reactionary #conservative ideologues, know that symbols are powerful, and wish to seize that power.
(2/x)
consider that diagram of Peterson's, the one I cited earlier—the concentric circles on a grey field labelled "The Dragon of Chaos". I'll copy it here for convenience.
I perceive that Peterson is consciously imitating the style of a *scientific* or technical diagram.