of *course* @sama's fake ChatGPT miracle relies upon an army of underpaid workers just out of sight! of _course_ it does! this is the work of modern #programmers, people without any known sense of ethics—and people stupid enough to believe their own lies.

the corporate #AI debacle deserves a proper dissection. the situation is appalling: people like @sama and @demishassabis make promises about their marvellous universal thinking machines that are *just shy* of outright fraud. and they program the machines with their own inanity.
that's the real problem here: @sama and @fchollet and all the other computer technicians who make grandiose promises and proclamations about #AI and "intelligence" are, to put the matter bluntly, completely incompetent at judging *anyone's* intellect, least of all their own.
they are people of exceedingly specialized and narrow expertise, and yet they pretend to be generalists? why? because #AI / #AGI is sold as the ultimate generalist.

that's the @fchollet / @sama / @demishassabis claim: they say their thinking machines can learn any material.
but @fchollet, @sama, &c. aren't capable of telling good material from bad—in general, #computer programmers are hopelessly ignorant and inept at all fields outside their limited domain. but they've convinced themselves their ignorance doesn't matter—their machines are "better".
but that's the problem. *how would they know 'better'?*

can @sama or @JeffDean, or any of the other superficial computer nerds who hopes to make a fortune by selling "artificially intelligent" software be trusted to know _anything_ that's not computer programming? anything?
I assert that the answer to this question is "no". @sama, @fchollet, &c. are not fit judges of knowledge outside their technical specialty.

they would have *no idea* whether their #AI / #MachineLearning tools were doing a good job of learning—they, themselves, *don't learn*.
they all *think* they've somehow gained mastery of every subject, but ask @sama or @fchollet any tough questions about any subject or field that's not their specialty—then it's easy to learn just how superficial their knowledge is. they have a Cliff's Notes grasp on the world.
and these are the people who say they're going to deliver us a universal thinking machine, good for all purposes. why you can even pay a sum of money for a robotic version of Winston Churchill, one who (like @bindelj or @Docstockk) has been programmed to deny British genocides.
the #AI crowd offer #capitalism no less than the erasure of history—the embodiment of legends and propaganda in programmatic form—the rejection of the inconvenient world of verifiable and material facts.

well done, @sama &c. you've found a way to destroy the *past*.

~Mona
and you'll be remembered for this achievement, @sama. oh yes. you have in fact made yourself famous.

I will make very sure of your fame, in fact—if nobody else does it first.

~Mona Drafter

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Pnictogen Horses

Pnictogen Horses Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PnictogenHorses

Jan 18
ah, here it is! we were trying to remember this: the tweet in which @fchollet eloquently demonstrated their incompetence at understanding how perception works, on a fundamental level.

this mountebank thinks that expectation precedes perception.

(1/x)
to put it more bluntly, @fchollet thinks that perceiving things starts with knowing what you want to perceive first. there's a word for this sort of perception: it's called BIAS. Chollet has, in his tweet, described *perceptual bias*: applying filters to one's perceptions.

(2/x)
why would @fchollet make such an elementary blunder? well, likely Chollet (in common with most #computer professionals these days) is hideously biased about most things. the high-tech field, especially in the higher echelons of management, is sodden with bias and bıgotry.

(3/x)
Read 7 tweets
Jan 12
we in the Pnictogen Wing are perhaps nearly alone in thinking that "flat-Earth" people, i.e. human beings who cling to the notion that the Earth is not a spheroid but instead a disc, are not totally pointless.

flat-Earthers are, for most of Western society, safe targets.

(1/x)
for that reason alone, we are drawn to try understanding the phenomenon better, rather than simply discard flat-Earthism and its adherents as worthless and laughable.

what drives a person to endorse such a quixotic worldview, one that insures their permanent ostracism?

(2/x)
there's emotional benefits to belonging in a mostly-despised faction, of course. the faction experiences so much pressure from outside, the society *inside* the bubble is practically forced to be orderly and well-disclipined—a safe haven from an otherwise chaotic world.

(3/x)
Read 25 tweets
Jan 11
#capitalism is essentially *backwards* looking. yes, capitalists attempt to pretend that they're the masters of #innovation and advancement of #technology, the builders of the #future, and all that.

it's lies—mere #marketing. capitalists do not like progress or change.

(1/x)
corporate #management and #executive persons want one thing above all others: guaranteed #money. they want *safe bets*. they don't want #competition or #risk; they want a steady source of "passive income" that always goes up and up.

(this causes #inflation, by the way.)

(2/x)
(yes, I know that #capitalism and the #business community, not to mention all #politics and #journalism these days, blame #inflation on the profligate #consumer—but in reality, inflation occurs because capitalists always want *more #money*; it has to come from somewhere.)

(3/x)
Read 18 tweets
Jan 11
#Christians and #Christianity are infamously *randy* and sex-obsessed, and it's difficult to accept that this fact is widely grasped and understood, yet it's still socially forbidden to bring it up. it's *rude* to point out too loudly that Christians are fixated on sex.

(1/x)
in the #Bible Belt of America, churches exist cheek-by-jowl with porn shops—American #Christians consume more pornography than the rest of America, and engage in enthusiastic commerce for the satisfaction of their sexual pleasures.

and they can't stop talking about it.

(2/x)
one senses that they *speak from experience*. reactionary right-wing #Christians of the @dalepartridge / @MattWalshBlog sort love blithering about the evils of fleshly pleasures in such a way that lets us know, they're thinking about these things a lot. they are *tempted*.

(3/x)
Read 11 tweets
Jan 11
one of the most curious stories that came out during the 2016 campaign, during which the inept candidacy of @HillaryClinton succumbed to the neo-fascıst movement and @mtaibbi's best friend @realDonaldTrump, was this act of petty corporate theft.

archive.is/Sk7zB

(1/x)
Trump, or rather his tax-shelter @TrumpFoundation (every rich #entrepreneur-criminal has a "foundation" of some sort, useful both for tax purposes and as a place to furnish sinecure jobs to cousins and loyal toadies and so on), was accused of fiddling money from a charity.

(2/x)
@realDonaldTrump's @GOP defenders (*not* including @mtaibbi, whose fandom for Trump and the GOP was predictably late in developing) tried to pretend that Trump or his people couldn't have possibly done such a thing: after all, Trump's already rich! on paper, anyway.

(3/x)
Read 24 tweets
Jan 10
none of us in the Pnictogen Wing is an expert in semiotics—that's the academic discipline pertaining to the study and meaning of *symbolism*. but we feel that we've been forced to take an amateur interest in the field mostly because *symbols* are much abused and exploited.

(1/x)
right-wing frauds like @jordanbpeterson and @ConceptualJames have done a land-office business in pretending to be experts in symbolism.

political ideologues, particularly reactionary #conservative ideologues, know that symbols are powerful, and wish to seize that power.

(2/x)
consider that diagram of Peterson's, the one I cited earlier—the concentric circles on a grey field labelled "The Dragon of Chaos". I'll copy it here for convenience.

I perceive that Peterson is consciously imitating the style of a *scientific* or technical diagram.

(3/x) Image
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(