the last twenty or thirty years have seen a remarkable intellectual phenomenon: #computer technicians, people whose sole area of expertise is computer #programming and #software engineering and other related disciplines, have come to be regarded as "Renaissance Men".
(1/x)
the "#STEM Lord" is an artifact of this phenomenon. while "STEM" is supposed to comprise mathematics and engineering and mathematics, the typical "STEM Lord" is not well-versed in any of these things—the typical "STEM Lord" is in #computers. they are a *technician*.
(2/x)
that is to say, #computer professionals are people with *limited* educations, who are devoted solely to mastering the intricacies of a certain sort of machinery, namely the modern computer.
it's dangerous (and offensive) for persons like @fchollet or @ID_AA_Carmack to regard themselves as knowledgeable scientists or engineers, because the #computing domain is almost wholly artificial and arbitrary. computer simulation is not required to line up with reality.
(4/x)
#programmers have appropriated the terminology of #science in order to make their jobs seem more rigorous and empirical than it really is. they speak of "in silico" experimentation—i.e. mere simulation that never needs to be tested in physical reality. it's publishable!
(5/x)
#capitalism likes cheap "content" quickly churned out, so computerized "experimentation" has become a fruitful avenue for generating dubious papers of "#scientificresearch" that consist only of #computer simulation. the "#STEM Lords" don't appreciate the difference.
(6/x)
meanwhile the promises made by these superficial men—and it is *almost completely* men, in the #STEM Lord / #computing professional classes—have inflated to gigantic proportions. men like @fchollet promise the world, and gullible #investors and #entrepreneurs eat it up.
#success in #business is *hindered* by intellectual understanding, for people with genuine knowledge of the sciences or the liberal arts aren't easily wowed by inflated promises. the glittering futures promised by @elonmusk or @fchollet make sense only to shallow persons.
(9/x)
the less you know, the shinier the promises seem.
in any case, #business skills are largely *impulsive* skills; all the business and #finance propaganda emphasizes making decisions without thought, with your "gut". the greatest business virtues are *emotional* virtues.
(10/x)
and, of course, #business success depends *far more* upon social status and privilege than it does on merit. #capitalism rewards nepotism and social snobbery; even having an unusually forcible name, like "King" or "Stone", can be of immense value in chasing #success.
(11/x)
therefore, everyone in corporate leadership and #management—all the managers and executives whose lives are dedicated mostly to chasing money and status—are bound to be people who can't tell when boffins like @elonmusk or @fchollet or @pmarca are making dodgy promises.
(12/x)
and no promise made by the #computer professional has been dodgier or shakier than the promise of #AI and of the "artificial general intelligence" (#AGI): the machine that promises to be *good at everything*, like @fchollet thinks he's good at everything, when he's not.
(13/x)
one can psychologically "project" onto machines, as well as other human beings.
the mere fact that our #technology industry has degenerated to such an appalling state is a monumental failure of Western civilization. our public intellectuals have all failed us.
our partner and best friend @KaylinEvergreen, to whom we feel we owe so much—we've benefited from the keenness of her mind; she "keeps it real" for us, and we *need* such tethering—doesn't like someone we talk frequently about, and that's the Christian celebrity, #CSLewis.
(1/x)
unfortunately, the Pnictogen Wing feels that it's got plenty of unfinished business with C. S. Lewis—"Jack" Lewis, to friends—because Lewis played a pivotal role in our lives. we rebounded from the disastrous 1992-4 mistake that was attending @Caltech towards #CSLewis.
(2/x)
we had caught a lucky break: our very first taste of C. S. Lewis wasn't something obvious. it wasn't the #Narnia books, which we didn't read until our mid-20s. it wasn't "The Screwtape Letters" or "Miracles" or any other of the famed Christian apologetic writings of Lewis.
we've experienced *that* tiresome person—the person who has extremely particular opinions and *rankings* about every single little thing, and who exhibits this snobbery as proof of superior intellect.
@antoniogm wrote (maybe) that he treated people like game entities.
(2/x)
people were more valuable to @antoniogm, or less valuable—that's what Sr. García Martínez said in his book "Chaos Monkeys", anyway...
...maybe. thanks to the practices of #capitalism and publication for profit, the true authorship of any book must always be in some doubt.
I have, quite seriously, rarely encountered a wider gap between pretension and reality. even @elonmusk seems more grounded at times.
~Mona
laughter aside...this is a serious issue. @walterkirn and @mtaibbi are but a symptom of a profound *sickness* in Western #journalism, a sickness whose ultimate cause can only be #capitalism—which rewards mediocrity and unfounded egotism in its systems of leadership.
~Mona
Kirn and Taibbi might as well be "Peter Principle" #management and #executive persons—people who have their lofty positions not because of *skill* but superior social privilege, and because they're more ruthless and cynical in their dealings with other people.
of *course* @sama's fake ChatGPT miracle relies upon an army of underpaid workers just out of sight! of _course_ it does! this is the work of modern #programmers, people without any known sense of ethics—and people stupid enough to believe their own lies.
the corporate #AI debacle deserves a proper dissection. the situation is appalling: people like @sama and @demishassabis make promises about their marvellous universal thinking machines that are *just shy* of outright fraud. and they program the machines with their own inanity.
that's the real problem here: @sama and @fchollet and all the other computer technicians who make grandiose promises and proclamations about #AI and "intelligence" are, to put the matter bluntly, completely incompetent at judging *anyone's* intellect, least of all their own.
ah, here it is! we were trying to remember this: the tweet in which @fchollet eloquently demonstrated their incompetence at understanding how perception works, on a fundamental level.
this mountebank thinks that expectation precedes perception.
to put it more bluntly, @fchollet thinks that perceiving things starts with knowing what you want to perceive first. there's a word for this sort of perception: it's called BIAS. Chollet has, in his tweet, described *perceptual bias*: applying filters to one's perceptions.
(2/x)
why would @fchollet make such an elementary blunder? well, likely Chollet (in common with most #computer professionals these days) is hideously biased about most things. the high-tech field, especially in the higher echelons of management, is sodden with bias and bıgotry.
we in the Pnictogen Wing are perhaps nearly alone in thinking that "flat-Earth" people, i.e. human beings who cling to the notion that the Earth is not a spheroid but instead a disc, are not totally pointless.
flat-Earthers are, for most of Western society, safe targets.
(1/x)
for that reason alone, we are drawn to try understanding the phenomenon better, rather than simply discard flat-Earthism and its adherents as worthless and laughable.
what drives a person to endorse such a quixotic worldview, one that insures their permanent ostracism?
(2/x)
there's emotional benefits to belonging in a mostly-despised faction, of course. the faction experiences so much pressure from outside, the society *inside* the bubble is practically forced to be orderly and well-disclipined—a safe haven from an otherwise chaotic world.