1) Hey, ring, wake your ass up.
"What? Why?"
BECAUSE I'M PISSED AND THE @nytimes IS ABOUT TO FUCKING GET SOME.
"What? Why?"
BECAUSE I'M PISSED AND THE @nytimes IS ABOUT TO FUCKING GET SOME.
2) "OH SHIT! The gun control narrative is blown to hell, people actually LIKE POMPEO being SoS, Drumpf needs to get smeared!" "I have JUST THE THING!" archive.is/RSqwZ
3) Archived for your viewing RAAAAAAGE. Now,t he authors. OH LOOK AT THAT ITS RAT NUMBER 10 on the @debradelai RAT LIST!!!! And of course perennial anti-trump fake newsie @maggieNYT MAGGIE HABERMAN!!!
4) "The special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, has subpoenaed the Trump Organization to turn over documents, including some related to Russia, according to two people briefed on the matter." FIRST STRIKE: 2 sources briefed on the matter. REALLY. REALLY MAGGIE. REALLY?
5) Second strike: GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS CAN ONLY BE LEGALLY REVEALED BY THE PEOPLE BEING SUBPOENAED. So SOMEONE is BREAKING THE FUCKING LAW by talking about these subpoenas.
6) "The breadth of the subpoena was not clear, nor was it clear why Mr. Mueller issued it instead of simply asking for the documents from the company, an umbrella organization that oversees Mr. Trump’s business ventures." You know what would help? ONLY REPORTING ON SHIT YOU SEE
7) "In the subpoena... Mr. Mueller ordered the Trump Organization to hand over all documents related to Russia and other topics he is investigating, the people said." Oh, sure, we'll take these two anonymous' sources words on a subpoena that you cannot even verify the breadth of.
8) Oh, hey, let's not just keep it to one article, because APPARENTLY the investigation based on bullshit supposition and rumor-mongering from Schmidt and Haberman is all about FOREIGN MONEY NOW archive.is/pIU4f#selectio…
9) "An adviser to the United Arab Emirates with ties to current and former aides to President Trump is cooperating with the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, and gave testimony last week to a grand jury, according to two people familiar with the matter."
10) Oh, so you went from two people familiar with the matter to two people briefed on the matter. GOOD JOB @maggieNYT, way to completely step up in the quality of your anonymous sources.
11) Back to the initial article. "The Trump Organization has said that it never had real estate holdings in Russia, but witnesses recently interviewed by Mr. Mueller have been asked about a possible real estate deal in Moscow." Really? No sourcing on this one? No links?
12) AMAZING how much you know about grand jury proceedings which are supposed to be kept secret. Really. Fucking INCREDIBLE. Such incredible journalistic work, really.
13) "The lawyers have advised Mr. Trump to refuse an interview but the president wants to do it, as he believes he has done nothing wrong and can easily answer investigators’ questions." Oh good job, you held off the mind reading 'til the end of the article! Kudos!
14) But, oh wait, there's no "The Special Counsel's office refused to comment" or anything like that. So you're just giving up any pretense that you AREN'T wildly extrapolating a narrative out of anonymous sources and scurrilous rumors?
15) Expect this story to spread like wildfire. AGAIN. Because fuck the truth, fuck journalism, fuck reality, this is the DNC Journoperative Circus, where every rumor gets a turn in the spotlight! If only @maggieNYT or @nytmike spent HALF as much effort on the Clinton Foundation.
/end
