Strike that.
Let's talk about economical writing.
Deidre McCloskey's little book on #EconomicalWriting is fantastic!!!
See my top takeaways from the book below
some economic arguments are a series of analogies, just like poetry. Realise it. Use it to your advantage. It can make your writing more persuasive.
Write notes in paragraph form (1 idea per paragraph, it doesn't have to be longer than 1 sentence). Print them out and cut up paragraphs. Rearrange on floor or table until the arrangement seems right.
It can help you edit more effectively.
Start with what you're going to say in a simple and concise way.
I have actually noticed how books do this.
My thesis currently starts like this:
I didn't understand, however, how else to make the path clear to the reader from the get go. If anyone has any advice, I am all ears!
I realised my lack of confidence early on in my PhD, which made/makes me use pompous words to make me sound more scientific. I have yet to find a solution to becoming more confident. Experience does help, though.
As Solow once said, economists need to realise they're organising thoughts on economic life and not (poorly) imitating physics.
"It doesn't matter what your first sentence is. It doesn't matter what the second is. But the third damn well better follow from the first and second" (51)
Never elaborate on more than one at a time.
"A sentence with too much in all three of its parts can ruin a paragraph:"
"["A sentence with too much in all three parts"] connected to a simple verb ["can ruin"] and simple object ["a paragraph"]" (54)
As if the sentence could stand alone as an isolated remark.
Say development if you mean development.
Ask yourself if you've used words to mean one thing.
Don't just put ideas at the end of sentences. Start a new one.
When editing circle all "ises" to see how many you have.
Removing "is" requires the sentence to have a subject, there is no escaping it. That is a good thing. Most sentences should have a subject.
Examine and discuss is better than analyse (analyse actually means cut to pieces in Latin).
The use of "due to" means the sentence is badly constructed. Rephrase.
e.g. rather than technology mention the actual technology such as a sewing machine.
Singular words are better than plurals.
Don't codify your language.
Simplify - be plain. Use everyday language.
A plain "the" will do or repeat the word represented by "this"
Can numbers influence policy makers? NO
Models cannot be severe.
Find better words and sentences to make yourself absolutely clear.
The little book (89 pages to be exact) actually made me laugh. Several times. I highly recommend it.