MORE TO THE STORY
1. I think I may have allowed myself to be misdirected by the DOJ and the Wapo.
After thinking carefully, & studying the enormous amount of research on Twitter regarding the possible identity of the FBI source. I think we may have been thrown off the trail.
1. I think I may have allowed myself to be misdirected by the DOJ and the Wapo.
After thinking carefully, & studying the enormous amount of research on Twitter regarding the possible identity of the FBI source. I think we may have been thrown off the trail.
2. Ever since this letter from the DOJ was released, we have been focused on "a specific individual". But, listen to what Nunes is quoted as saying in the WaPo. on Wednesday may 9th. See points #3 & #4 
3. "On Monday, Nunes told reporters that his request did not seek information about a specific person.
“I’ve never referenced an individual. They did. They did that. I didn’t,” he said, referring to the Justice Department."
“I’ve never referenced an individual. They did. They did that. I didn’t,” he said, referring to the Justice Department."
4. Also, from the same article:
"The subpoena, which was reviewed by The Washington Post, demands “all documents referring or related to the individual referenced in Chairman Nunes’ April 24, 2018 classified letter to Attorney General Sessions....."
"The subpoena, which was reviewed by The Washington Post, demands “all documents referring or related to the individual referenced in Chairman Nunes’ April 24, 2018 classified letter to Attorney General Sessions....."
5. "..That is the only material the subpoena seeks. In an interview Wednesday, Nunes maintained that he was “not interested in any individual.”
7. So, what could that mean ? This story may be bigger that I originally thought. Do you remember how this whole Russian affair started? The narrative was the Russians hacked the DNC emails in an attempt to hurt HRC and help Trump. Curious story today👇
8. Has anyone else noticed that as soon as as @JulianAssange started talking about Misfud, he lost his access to the internet ? What if the whole Russian hacking narrative was a farce. Remember Misfud talking to Papadop before Halper about Russian dirt on HRC? 👇
9. "The Maltese (Misfud) professor, who allegedly delivered word of Hillary Clinton’s stolen emails to Donald Trump's campaign, is an authentically mysterious figure, his true role and ties to Russian intelligence unclear. "
buzzfeed.com/albertonardell…
buzzfeed.com/albertonardell…
10. Curiously, Misfud also has ties to British Intelligence. Note this excerpt from a Disobedient Media article interviewing Chris Blackburn, a UK Political Analyst.
"Ultimately, Disobedient Media’s previous coverage of Mifsud’s links to UK intelligence and Chris Blackburn’s.."
"Ultimately, Disobedient Media’s previous coverage of Mifsud’s links to UK intelligence and Chris Blackburn’s.."
11. ... thorough research suggest that the same interests involved in the fabrication of Russian hacking fingerprints via the anonymous Guccifer 2.0 persona are associated with the concoction of faulty evidence for the Trump-Russia collusion narrative. "
12. Blackburn goes on to say:
"In the Trump-Russia and Russian hacking narratives, American and UK intelligence agencies appear to have recklessly and deceptively acted in the interest of a single political candidate, Hillary Clinton....."
"In the Trump-Russia and Russian hacking narratives, American and UK intelligence agencies appear to have recklessly and deceptively acted in the interest of a single political candidate, Hillary Clinton....."
13. "...This singularity of purpose speaks to the insecurity and magnitude of the unelected Western power structure, equaled by the scale of lies propping up the Trump-Russia and Russian hacking narratives. "
14. Our old pal, Peter Stzrok just so happens to be involved with Misfud as well. I know, right? Who coulda guessed. 👇
"There are enough red flags here to suggest that Mifsud was potentially tied to efforts to kick-start a phony investigation that was designed to be leaked
"There are enough red flags here to suggest that Mifsud was potentially tied to efforts to kick-start a phony investigation that was designed to be leaked
15. to the American press. Peter Strzok, the counter-intelligence official that started the Joseph Mifsud investigation, has been demoted and removed from Mueller’s investigative team..."
16. "...Mifsud is a mystery to people that can’t be bothered to look, but many journalists are aware of his links.”
And to cap it off
“Peter Strzok, the FBI’s former counter-intelligence chief who was running the Mifsud case, should have found a few major red flags
And to cap it off
“Peter Strzok, the FBI’s former counter-intelligence chief who was running the Mifsud case, should have found a few major red flags
17. "..that would bring his motives into question."
What if Strozk had no desire to bring his motives into question. Suppose they were working together. Hmm... planting a story that could then be used to ensnare?
The article which I've been quoting. 👇disobedientmedia.com/2018/04/a-conv…
What if Strozk had no desire to bring his motives into question. Suppose they were working together. Hmm... planting a story that could then be used to ensnare?
The article which I've been quoting. 👇disobedientmedia.com/2018/04/a-conv…
18, So, you see, there is much, much more to this story than "an individual," as we have been led to believe. We need to remember some names;, U.K.,Misfud, Rebecca Peters, Halper, Strzok, Dearlove, The London Centre for International Law Practice and so many more.
19. I think it's safe to say that we are on the verge of a major political dust-up with our closest ally, the U.K. It would seem to me that they were much more involved in the plot against Trump than was previously known. Some might even use the word, "complicit."
20. I would say that the "new line of inquiry" being pursued by @DevinNunes is about a lot more than one individual within or tangential to the Trump campaign. I suspect Rosenstein will fight tooth and nail to prevent these documents from being handed over. Roseinstein's Alamo.
Addendum:
Addendum: Just to be absolutely clear in case I didn't make my point:
Yes, I agree its Halper, but my point was, its not *just* Halper. If I didn't make that clear then I failed to do what I set out to do. It's Halper, Misfud et..etc..
Thus Nunes statement re: "individual"
Yes, I agree its Halper, but my point was, its not *just* Halper. If I didn't make that clear then I failed to do what I set out to do. It's Halper, Misfud et..etc..
Thus Nunes statement re: "individual"
Addendum: What did we learn from the Schiff memo?
"Schiff memo reveals that Misfud specifically told Papadop Russia would release DNC emails to help Trump campaign."
See Schiff's tweet. 👇 Just one problem. What if Misfud wasn't a Russian agent?
"Schiff memo reveals that Misfud specifically told Papadop Russia would release DNC emails to help Trump campaign."
See Schiff's tweet. 👇 Just one problem. What if Misfud wasn't a Russian agent?
Addendum:
From the article Chris Blackburn: “If Mifsud is a genuine Russian asset, he has been enabled by the United States’ most trusted allies. His relationship with senior intelligence and political leaders in Europe should constitute one of the greatest security breaches.."
From the article Chris Blackburn: “If Mifsud is a genuine Russian asset, he has been enabled by the United States’ most trusted allies. His relationship with senior intelligence and political leaders in Europe should constitute one of the greatest security breaches.."
Addendum:
"...in decades. He had access to diplomats in training, sanctions targets and counter-terrorism strategy in the Middle East and South Asia. However, government reactions don’t show that. The FBI doesn’t appear to have warned their closest allies.”
A Russian Agent? Nah.
"...in decades. He had access to diplomats in training, sanctions targets and counter-terrorism strategy in the Middle East and South Asia. However, government reactions don’t show that. The FBI doesn’t appear to have warned their closest allies.”
A Russian Agent? Nah.
