Profile picture
T. A. Jackson @TAJackson20
, 16 tweets, 5 min read Read on Twitter
Reading the economist is illuminating. Everything the bugman overclass thinks is laid out in stark, almost crude, prose. economist.com/leaders/2018/0…
Like this, for example. If you're confused by this part so counter to common sense (less time at home means better parenting?) being thrown out of nowhere with no citations, understand that these people LITERALLY mean "investment."
So, why, you might ask, are the ruling class so insistent on female labour, then? Surely, as neoliberals, they believe that income corresponds to productivity, so why does female unemployment matter if the husbands can pick up the slack? Well...
Remember how Thatcher infamously told us that "there's no such thing as society?" The Anglos have gotten even worse somehow. Now there's no such thing as society OUTSIDE WORK.
"government make-work schemes attract more women than men."

It's not even about productivity, and they admit this casually.
"Oh no, we don't have to work in sweatshops. That sucks."
t. The Economist's hypothetical Indian woman.

(for real though, you Indians gotta be vigilant for suppressing this stuff. That highlighted part created the exact conditions for modern feminism in the west.)
Well done, Indians! I'd really like to know how you guys managed this. "Subduing the urban bughive" is one of the most pressing issues in the west right now.
China may never achieve communism, but India has achieved distributism, I see.

Note the telling phrase "sucked into jobs." In the west, we call it "the two-income trap." A lesser magazine would pretend that this was about "empowerment" or something.
Remember: two working parents is a horrible decision and once your society starts, it can't easily stop: amazon.com/Two-Income-Tra…
Wait, WHAT sins? India's spent hundreds of years being a British colony and/or being reigned by the Mughal Empire. What on Earth could they be responsible for? At least white guilt has a kind of dream logic about it.
Powerful.
Again, lesser neoliberal propagandists would throw some token platitudes about work-life balance or some shit, but the Economist doesn't give a fuck and wants you to be fully clear that you should be trading husbands in for jobs.
So, what have we learned here? That everything progs told you before was a pretnese.
It's not about giving women options, their only option should be to work.
It's not about women's education, that's pointless if they don't work.
It's not about "having it all," jobs>husbands.
No, the Anglo bugmen want your families destroyed and your daughters sucked into "mega-factory" (their words!) sweatswhops because GDP is their God and they'd like to outsource even more western labour.

Liberalism is the cult of capital in the cause of humanity.
I.E. The universal, abstracted "humanity" divorced from any particular human beings, or even any particular group of them. The "rights of Man" that Maistre so ably mocked.
Supplementary info from an Indian follower via the DMs about how India doubled its economy while restricted female out-of-home employment.

Stay made, Anglos. 🤣
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to T. A. Jackson
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member and get exclusive features!

Premium member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year)

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!