"Why won't you even TRY to convince me and my army of unconvincable trolls?" whined America's Head Boy, waving daddy's money.
Poor Charlie Kirk, America's RA, seen here giving us just *one* chance to lose the keg or he is calling campus safety.
We don't give a shit whether he agrees with us, and we have no interest at all in trying.
He no like it.
We don't give a shit whether he agrees with us, and we have no interest at all in trying.
He no like it.
Poor Ben Shapiro (below, actual size). We think it's a very good idea to provide for the basic human needs of everybody, and we know there's enough money to do so.
And we don't have the slightest interest in his opinions about why that would be a bad idea.
And we don't have the slightest interest in his opinions about why that would be a bad idea.
Poor Candace Owens. When you decide to be the sort of person who speaks up for the beliefs you've chosen to speak up for, the only people who want to talk to you are the sorts of people who believe those things.
No debate for you. Sad face.
No debate for you. Sad face.
How about instead I just ignore people who say "suck it up" and spend my energy building a more just and equitable society that respects the humanity of all people, even including people who say 'suck it up?'
I'm increasingly convinced the primary reason these folks want to debate is to waste time and energy.
If your premise is "here's why we shouldn't care for literally every person," I'm sorry but you're wrong and boring, and there's work to do.
If your premise is "here's why we shouldn't care for literally every person," I'm sorry but you're wrong and boring, and there's work to do.
Nice job with the arrangement of your facts and the construction of your argument. Flawless.
You've architected a very well-constructed and efficient abattoir.
We are trying to make a garden.
You've architected a very well-constructed and efficient abattoir.
We are trying to make a garden.
My defense of my 'ideas':
I am architecting a case for empathy and equality. I'm very interested in talking about how to get there.
I'm not interested in someone's architecture of indifference and abandonment. I'm even less interested in how they drew it up.
I am architecting a case for empathy and equality. I'm very interested in talking about how to get there.
I'm not interested in someone's architecture of indifference and abandonment. I'm even less interested in how they drew it up.
Compass sets direction.
Direction determines navigation.
Navigation decides the course.
Course brings you to your destination.
If somebody can't even agree on the basics of the compass, why do I want to argue with him about his navigation or destination?
I don't.
Direction determines navigation.
Navigation decides the course.
Course brings you to your destination.
If somebody can't even agree on the basics of the compass, why do I want to argue with him about his navigation or destination?
I don't.
If you want to debate us, fix your compasses. Become the sorts of people who believe the sort of thing we would have the slightest interest in debating.
Otherwise fuck the whole way off. We're busy.
Otherwise fuck the whole way off. We're busy.
