Mr. Rosenstein, What Is the Crime? nationalreview.com/2018/09/trump-…
What’s the legal basis for his special-counsel investigation? We have a right to know.
For precisely what federal crimes is the president of the United States under investigation by a special counsel appointed by the Justice Department?
For precisely what federal crimes is the president of the United States under investigation by a special counsel appointed by the Justice Department?
It is intolerable that, after more than two years of digging — the 16-month Mueller probe having been preceded by the blatantly suspect labors of the Obama Justice Department and FBI — we still do not have an answer to that simple question.
Deputy AG Rosenstein owes us an answer
Deputy AG Rosenstein owes us an answer
“To my mind, he has owed us an answer from the beginning, meaning when he appointed Special Counsel Robert Mueller on May 17, 2017.”
“The regulations under which he made the appointment require (a) a factual basis for believing that a federal crime worthy of investigation or prosecution has been committed;”
“b) a conflict of interest so significant that the Justice Department is unable to investigate this suspected crime in the normal course;” and
“ (c) an articulation of the factual basis for the criminal investigation — i.e., the investigation of specified federal crimes — which shapes the boundaries of the special counsel’s jurisdiction.”
“This last provision is designed to prevent a special counsel’s investigation from becoming a fishing expedition — or what President Trump calls a “witch hunt,” what DAG Rosenstein more diplomatically disclaims as an “unguided missile,”
“And what and what Harvard’s Alan Dershowitz, invoking Lavrentiy Beria, Stalin’s secret-police chief, pans as the warped dictum, “Show me the man and I’ll show you the crime.” In our country, the crime triggers the assignment of a prosecutor, not the other way around.”
What Is the Crime?
“There is one thing and one thing alone that would justify the appointment of a special counsel: concrete evidence that Trump committed a crime in connection with Russia’s election interference.”
“There is one thing and one thing alone that would justify the appointment of a special counsel: concrete evidence that Trump committed a crime in connection with Russia’s election interference.”
“So, to repeat: For precisely what federal crime is the president of the United States under investigation?”
“We’re not asking for much. After 16 months, we are just asking why there is a criminal investigation of the president.”
“If Rosenstein would just explain what the regs call for him to explain — namely, the basis to believe Trump conspired with the Kremlin to violate a specific federal criminal law, or is somehow criminally complicit in Kremlin election sabotage — then we can get behind Mueller.”
“But what is the explanation? And why isn’t the Republican-controlled Congress demanding it?”
