1. Now that the president has said nearly 3,000 people did not die in the aftermath of Hurricane Maria, it’s time talk about something few talk about because it’s taboo.
Political revenge.
Political revenge.
2. Why taboo? Because no matter what they may say to the contrary, most liberals agree with Michelle Obama, who said during the 2016 Democratic National Convention that Republicans will go low. They always do. But when they do, we don’t follow them.
“We go high,” she said
“We go high,” she said
3. This was not a declaration of fact. Plenty of Democrats go low, too. It was rather an aspirational statement rooted in moral thinking of the ancients. The lust for justice, for the taking of an eye for an eye, is set deep in our human DNA.
4. But we are not captive of it, or don’t have to be. We can choose a higher course, a justice that does not lead us to the depravity of those who caused us to seek justice.
5. Liberals have been debating Obama’s statement since before the 2016 election. How do you go high, for instance, when the Senate Majority Leader breaks decorum, thus stealing a United States Supreme Court appointee from the democratically elected president?
6. The debate isn’t yet settled, but I tend to agree with @yeselson, a contributing editor for @DissentMag, who said recently that one party maintaining norms while the other vaporizes them
7. “is catastrophically wrong, normatively and politically. [The] only way to restore norms is if both sides suffer from their collapse.”
8. In other words, we may have arrived at a time when revenge is the only way forward. We might not want to seek revenge for its own sake, but then again, how can we avoid it? At the same time, revenge sounds so good, doesn’t it?
9. I mean, who among us would not feel the cockles of her heart warming at the sight of the president getting perp-walked out of the White House? Indeed, we seem to have gotten one step closer with news that Paul Manafort struck a plea deal to cooperate with Robert Mueller.
10. Since the facts of the matter seem to be leading in the direction of revenge anyway, why not give in to it?
11. Certainly the Democratic base yearns for revenge. I can think of no other reason why Michael Avenatti would consider running for president. He’s Stormy Daniels attorney.
12. As far as I can tell, he knows nothing about government, policy, or ideology. He may not even care. But he knows an audience and opportunity when he sees them. As @EricLevitz wrote: “[Avenatti has] centered his nascent campaign on a call for tactical ruthlessness.
13. Levitz: His message is, in so many words: ‘I might not be the most eloquent or credible advocate for universal health care, criminal justice reform, or paid family leave—
14. Levitz, on Avenatti: ... but I’m the one who will fight the hardest (and dirtiest) to win the American people a generous settlement on all those fronts.’”
15. I don’t think Dianne Feinstein was thinking about revenge when she referred a letter to the FBI that alleged Brett Kavanaugh had, while a teen, forced himself on a girl. That she was not seeking revenge doesn’t matter to those of us thrilled by his denying the allegation.
16. Denying anything gives credence to allegations. Even if he’s confirmed (and he will be), Kavanaugh will walk to his place on SCOTUS with a severe limp and with the whiff of illegitimacy (for a host of other reasons, including the fact he’s lied under oath numerous times).
17. The kind of revenge that will matter most will happen at the ballot box. Think about it. We have a president who has not only exploited his relationships with women. He has bragged about it.
18. He had a chance to stop to allegations—by telling us, for instance, that Stormy Daniels was right—but he didn’t. He doubled down. This is only a small factor is a larger treatment of women, which includes Hillary Clinton.
19. Let’s remember: the number of women running for offices high and low this year has shattered records.
20. Why is that? It’s not just because women are suddenly angry. They have had good reason to be angry for as long as men have been around.
21. I think thousands of women are running, and winning, because they saw what happened to the most competent presidential candidate in modern memory and said to themselves: that’s wrong, that so wrong that I’m going to do something about it.
Lastly revenge is not immoral. It's settling a score. Righting a wrong. That means something. It should mean something. Given the number of women winning, it will. Please sign up for daily analysis. Thanks! stoehr.substack.com/p/dont-underra…
