For the love of God. How do Flake's principles of "fairness and due process" line up with:
1. Rushing a vote today.
2. Preventing an FBI investigation.
3. Hiring a prosecutor to interrogate the victim, then stopping her once she starts finding holes in the accused's account...
1. Rushing a vote today.
2. Preventing an FBI investigation.
3. Hiring a prosecutor to interrogate the victim, then stopping her once she starts finding holes in the accused's account...
4. Refusing to subpoena the witness who the victim says was in the room?
5. Giving the presumption in favor of the one who told an obvious series of falsehoods and misrepresentations under oath?
(Long thread with many links here)
5. Giving the presumption in favor of the one who told an obvious series of falsehoods and misrepresentations under oath?
(Long thread with many links here)
6. Giving the presumption to Kavanaugh despite a breathtaking "coincidence" from his own calendar. Remarkably, his July 1st entry lines up w/ Prof. Ford's account.
This evidence is still corroborating, even if it's no smoking gun or Mark Judge's testimony.
This evidence is still corroborating, even if it's no smoking gun or Mark Judge's testimony.
7. Kavanaugh's calendar for July 1, 1982: “Go to Timmy’s for skis, w/ Judge, Tom, PJ, Bernie, Squi.”
Skis = Brewskis = Beer. (No waterskiing near Bethesda).
Prof. Ford named Kavanaugh, Mark Judge and PJ specifically.
What are the chances?
Skis = Brewskis = Beer. (No waterskiing near Bethesda).
Prof. Ford named Kavanaugh, Mark Judge and PJ specifically.
What are the chances?
