,
3 tweets,
2 min read
Hey liar,
By 1837,Konark had already been destroyed and out of use, having suffered Jihadi invasions.Raja of Khurda moved a few sculptures of Hindu Gods from ruins of Konark and respectfully installed them in Puri Jagannath temple where they stand today. You call this demolition?
By 1837,Konark had already been destroyed and out of use, having suffered Jihadi invasions.Raja of Khurda moved a few sculptures of Hindu Gods from ruins of Konark and respectfully installed them in Puri Jagannath temple where they stand today. You call this demolition?
Konark was a desecrated site. In Hindu tradition, desecrated holy sites are generally not considered fit to worship. This is the reason why Hindus generally abandoned ruined temples to construct newer ones. An undamaged image was consecrated elsewhere
This so called "scholar" is a fraud, lacks scholarly ethics and integrity.He cites Mitra as a source of his fake claim. Nowhere in his book does Mitra say that "Raja of Khudra demolished Konark temple".I challenge you to cite Page No or take back your lies
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.
You can try to force a refresh.