Account Share

 

Thread by @TrueIndology: "Hey liar, By 1837,Konark had already been destroyed and out of use, having suffered Jihadi invasions.Raja of Khurda moved a few sculptures o […]"

, 3 tweets, 2 min read
Hey liar,
By 1837,Konark had already been destroyed and out of use, having suffered Jihadi invasions.Raja of Khurda moved a few sculptures of Hindu Gods from ruins of Konark and respectfully installed them in Puri Jagannath temple where they stand today. You call this demolition?
Konark was a desecrated site. In Hindu tradition, desecrated holy sites are generally not considered fit to worship. This is the reason why Hindus generally abandoned ruined temples to construct newer ones. An undamaged image was consecrated elsewhere
This so called "scholar" is a fraud, lacks scholarly ethics and integrity.He cites Mitra as a source of his fake claim. Nowhere in his book does Mitra say that "Raja of Khudra demolished Konark temple".I challenge you to cite Page No or take back your lies
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.
This content can be removed from Twitter at anytime, get a PDF archive by mail!
This is a Premium feature, you will be asked to pay $30.00/year
for a one year Premium membership with unlimited archiving.
Don't miss anything from @TrueIndology,
subscribe and get alerts when a new unroll is available!
Did Thread Reader help you today?
Support me: I'm a solo developer! Read more about the story
Become a 💎 Premium member ($30.00/year) and get exclusive features!
Too expensive?
Make a small donation instead. Buy me a coffee ($5) or help for the server cost ($10):
Donate with 😘 Paypal or  Become a Patron 😍 on Patreon.com
Trending hashtags
Did Thread Reader help you today?
Support me: I'm a solo developer! Read more about the story
Become a 💎 Premium member ($30.00/year) and get exclusive features!
Too expensive?
Make a small donation instead. Buy me a coffee ($5) or help for the server cost ($10):
Donate with 😘 Paypal or  Become a Patron 😍 on Patreon.com