Child killer Huntley says jump and the liberal community rush to ask how high. I understand that critical thinking at this point brings the house of cards down, but can they not see the problem with this?
Huntley: I’m a born again Christian please can everyone call me Jesus?
Everyone: shh Ian. Huntley: I’m a sociopath can I go to secure hospital instead of prison?
Everyone: Ian, we’ve told you to shh
Ian <thinks> I’m a woman! Call me Nicola!
Liberals: OMG YES.
Everyone: shh Ian. Huntley: I’m a sociopath can I go to secure hospital instead of prison?
Everyone: Ian, we’ve told you to shh
Ian <thinks> I’m a woman! Call me Nicola!
Liberals: OMG YES.
He *literally* tried to self ID as completely batshit crazy in an attempt to manipulate the system. He dribbled and stared blankly at the police. Yet now he wears fucking *eye liner* and it’s off to the women’s estate (yes, I know that hasn’t happened yet but..)
Why is his “I’m a woman” delusion ANY more valid than his “I’m mad”, “I’m alowed to kill these two little girls”, “I’m clever enough to be interviewed on tv after I’d murdered them and say it’s mystery” delusions? Why is being a woman of SO LITTLE value that people validate it?
Why is being a woman of so little value that the women in the prison he moves to aren’t considered, or the young girls he murdered, or the mother’s of those girls. His delusion allows him into their sex, their space. That is not ok.
And yet...people say deadnaming is not ok Uber any circumstances. Calling Huntley Nicola is validating his delusion. It is allowing him to redefine himself, manipulate and change his situation. It’s giving him back control.
Here is an article that details how Huntley slipped through safeguarding policies, having abused girls. How? BY CHANGING HIS NAME. theguardian.com/uk/2003/dec/17…
