Thread by @tony_nog

1) Let's put this in context:
To create "fairness" between a Polish worker & a Pakistani one, a Socialist MP agrees with the government on taking rights away from the Polish worker to get parity

Let's take some examples of this applied elsewhere

https://twitter.com/mikegalsworthy/status/1075537837418864640

2) a male doing job X gets £20k, the equivalent female gets £14k - the response is to cut the male's salary by £6k

2 schools are get very different results, to fix this the highest performer has its funding cut

Cancer care in Region A is better than B, so A fires a consultant

3) this would be nonsense for a Labour government & yet Abbot is essentially celebrating the removal of rights from EU nationals to bring them to the same low level as Commonwealth ones

Is this what Labour stands for? Apparently it does because "fixing FoM" is a Labour Red line

4) this is what the line in the 6 tests about "fair migration policy" meant - ending FoM, just like May & the Tories.

It also means no Single Market as we know its a requirement.

Which means "close relationship with SM" was bullshit
As was "we'd get a better deal than May"

5) Ending FoM defined May's #Brexit deal, and as Labour have the same red line, they'd have reached the same deal, with all the same problems, only they didn't really tell their largely pro FoM supporters

May wants a hard Brexit, so does Labour
The leadership are a disgrace
End/