,
7 tweets,
2 min read
Read on Twitter
Oh FFS, my initial take on the Bezos' divorce (thread).
As more details unfold what I'm seeing is a lot of the 'fem-stream' press attempt to get out ahead of what's undoubtedly going to be the single largest divorce settlement in the history of the world – $160B
As more details unfold what I'm seeing is a lot of the 'fem-stream' press attempt to get out ahead of what's undoubtedly going to be the single largest divorce settlement in the history of the world – $160B
So we're seeing all these stories coming out about how Jeff had a glass-eyed mistress or how Mackenzie 'deserves' the $160B payout because "there'd be no Amazon without her" even though she's never owned Amazon stock.
This is all pretty much squid ink to distract from the 200lb turd in the room which is that our divorce industry in the US presumes a wife is entitled to the sum of $160B for no other reason than she happened to take the chance on banging a nerd with some potential
But this is how the divorce industry works and the fact that a divorce settlement is poised to create the single richest woman on planet earth in a few months is something that shines a very bad light on the Feminine Imperative, to say nothing about the state of marriage.
So, predictably, the fem-stream media must till the fields ahead of the game so as to distract us from the real, glaringly grotesque, story of how resources are really transferred from men to women.
Thus, Jeff has to be made into an obscenely rich sperg who sends nudes to his fomorian mistress and like a "typical male" leaves his loving devote sweetheart who was the actual source of his outrageous success.
It's an easy cliché to sell to 'fempowered' women in the age of the post-Trump #genderwar . It also feeds the indignation needs for women and their 'allies' so it's doubly satisfying.
