,
12 tweets,
3 min read
Read on Twitter
Doing a mini-review of cultural evolution-inspired experiments on conformity ('disproportionate tendency to copy the majority') with adults. Trying to not be myself biased, but only 1 out of 10 found strong support.
Popularity cues interact with many other factors and, in general, they are almost never followed automatically. Is there something obvious I overlooked?
When in Rome . . .An Evolutionary Perspective on Conformity - 1/10 journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.117…
Applying evolutionary models to the laboratory study of social learning - 2/10 sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
Learning, productivity, and noise: an experimental study
of cultural transmission on the Bolivian Altiplano - 3/10 sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
of cultural transmission on the Bolivian Altiplano - 3/10 sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
Conformists and mavericks: the empirics of frequency-dependent cultural transmission - 4/10 sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
Beyond existence and aiming outside the laboratory: estimating frequency-dependent and pay-off-biased social learning strategies - 5/10 royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.10…
ARE PEOPLE REALLY CONFORMIST-BIASED? AN EMPIRICAL TEST AND A NEW MATHEMATICAL MODEL - 6/10 sro.sussex.ac.uk/44008/1/Erikss…
The evolutionary basis of human social
learning - 7/10 royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rs…
learning - 7/10 royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rs…
Evidence for Weak or Linear Conformity but Not for Hyper-Conformity in an Everyday Social Learning Context - 8/10 journals.plos.org/plosone/articl…
Frequency of Behavior Witnessed and Conformity in an Everyday Social Context - 9/10 journals.plos.org/plosone/articl…
The when and who of social learning and conformist transmission - 10/10 sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
