Testimony by Trisha Anderson highlights unusual process used by FBI and DOJ to obtain FISA warrant on former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page
theepochtimes.com/senior-fbi-law…
Anderson, while defending her handling of the Page FISA signing, claimed that Baker had “personally reviewed and made edits to the FISA.”
Baker specifically did not review the underlying Woods Procedure file, which provided documentation for the accuracy of facts represented in the FISA application.
“[W]hatever briefing I received from my folks about what was in the application, my assessment was that the information that we were providing was adequate and consistent.
“[T]he review by an SESer within FBI OGC, it happens on a very short timeframe. In other words, those SESers often will get a stack of FISAs"
“There's not a lot of opportunity for substantive review.”
Anderson claimed that the FBI “Director might on any particular day receive a stack of as many as 15, 17, 20 FISAs.”
With "20 minutes" allotted for review.
At the time of the FISA application, these allegations had not been verified or validated by the FBI when they were presented to the FISA court in support of probable cause.
Baker testified that had he known of this information it would have been subject to further consideration for inclusion in the FISA application.
/End