,
4 tweets,
2 min read
Read on Twitter
This statement from Facebook about Tommy Robinson being banned is the stuff of petty authoritarians. newsroom.fb.com/news/2019/02/r…
Zero citations. No examples.
Also, incredibly vague - tommy Robinson has “behaved in ways that violate our policies around organized hate.”
Which policies? How? When? By what standard?
Also, incredibly vague - tommy Robinson has “behaved in ways that violate our policies around organized hate.”
Which policies? How? When? By what standard?
This is the part that is terrifying.
Facebook has deemed Tommy Robinson a “hate figure” and says that “praise or support for these figures” is banned.
So - if I criticize Facebook’s ban of Tommy Robinson, am I “supporting” a hate figure?”
Facebook has deemed Tommy Robinson a “hate figure” and says that “praise or support for these figures” is banned.
So - if I criticize Facebook’s ban of Tommy Robinson, am I “supporting” a hate figure?”
If @Breitbart reports on the matter- in a supportive way - are they in violation of @Facebook’s policies?
breitbart.com/europe/2019/02…
breitbart.com/europe/2019/02…
