, 5 tweets, 2 min read
The headline on NBC’s interview with Cindy Yang (“Ex-spa owner denies selling access to Trump…”) is baffling.
In the footage that aired, she wasn’t asked about this. Nor was she asked about her company’s website, which explicitly offered opportunities to “interact with the president…and other political figures.”
Nor was Yang apparently asked to explain the numerous PHOTOGRAPHS of her squiring Chinese executives around Mar-a-Lago and other political events.
What is the value of interviews like this, arranged by defense lawyers and which allow the subjects to deny serious allegations while going largely unchallenged?
For actual investigative journalism that is advancing the Yang saga, check out the @miamiherald's scoop today miamiherald.com/news/politics-…
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Daniel Schulman
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!