A brief thread about some of what I witnessed
(Spoiler: this isn’t pretty)
Thread
1/12
MG6C at the door of court. It contained 3 items. One of those items was marked as the custody record and endorsed CND, notwithstanding it’s a PACE entitlement
2/12
3/12
So far so good and all in accordance its counsels duty. We then enter court and things start to go a little bit crazy.
4/12
I oppose. DJ rules no adjournment
Happy days……
Nope
DJ persuades prosecutor to proceed through to trial, and she does precisely that.
5/12
DJ rules they’ve been agreed by virtue of case management form from 1st appearance. fact that correspondence post dates form is irrelevant.
6/12
Case management form filled out on first appearance asks if facts may be capable of agreement. The DJ rules that ticked box has the force of an irrevocable admission.
7/12
Application by defence to adjourn to allow us to view CCTV – refused.
It may not surprise you to learn we were convicted.
8/12
Some magistrates courts have no semblance of justice. Rules of evidence and procedure play second fiddle to expediency
9/12
10/12
11/12
12/12 ends