Lot of opeds/articles from India questioning why Modi is soft on China or not able to take punitive measures for Masood Azhar listing issue.
But the view point of someone sitting on the Indian PM’s chair faced with ground realities will be quite different.
The economic &military power asymmetry now is heavily in China’s favor.
China has around $ 3 trillion in reserves while India is around $ 400 bn.
As per 2017 data from WB, China’s GDP per capita is $8,827, and India’s is $1,942.
China adds around half of India’s GDP every year to its economy.
To add what China adds every year India has to grow by around 40% a year & real growth at that (ToI).
Bulk of its population is along its coastal belt areas.
This favors manufacturing & trade where China dominates.
By contrast bulk of Indian population are in the interior region or BIMARU states.
China has around 2 to 3 times the naval assets & almost double the air assets.
China’s army currently has around double the manpower but is rapidly reducing and modernizing them.
Also given the lack of an indigenous military industry most arms are imported including ammunitions with 10 day war stock.
India has to deal with many more in Kashmir, North-East and the Naxals along its tribal belt in Central India.
There are also growing religious tensions.
A 2 front challenge.
The entire Pakistani missile tech and a sizeable section of nuclear tech is from China. Now aircrafts.
Big OBOR investment too.
Explains muted reaction to JeM Chief listing issue and no trade action.
Given the power asymmetry India has adopted a careful & defensive posture on China only willing to defend but not to offend or initiate challenge.
It is from the developed west led by the US and allies anxious about China’s growing strength and muscular foreign policy and its implications on them in terms of military, trade, global clout, tech etc.
Last Indian PM who ‘stood upto’ China, albeit unprepared, through ‘Forward Policy’ was Nehru.
The 62 war hit India’s international standing and broke Nehru.
Post 62 & until Bush/Manmohan’s nuclear deal it never saw India as a major challenger but India’s economic rise & its efforts to secure itself with ties to US was seen as a challenge.
For this my February 2018 thread on Xi’s then elevation has some analysis
China never become more liberal, benign or friendlier as expected. warontherocks.com/2019/03/jaw-ja…
This very important statement from China for first time gaurantees Pak territory/sovty weeks after Balakot.
India does not enjoy similar commitments from USA or the west.
indianexpress.com/article/world/…
Move is purportedly to safeguard its CPEC coal mines there but it comes after Balakot.
Shows concern for investment in Pak & sends a signal to India.
google.com/amp/s/sputnikn…
My view is not really.
Apart from external challenges with the West getting more firm on it with joint patrols on South China Sea , Huawei actions & trade talks - it also has huge internal economic and political challenges.
Given how data is fudged international experts say real growth could be 5%.
It has $ 34 trillion in private & public debt higher than the US national debt of $ 22 trillion.
Large loans to inefficient state owned enterprises & local govts also among them.
Then there is non-FI unofficial loans.
Entire legitimacy of Communist party to rule unopposed is understanding that it will provide economic prosperity.
This legitimacy is challenged when prosperity is hampered.
This in part explains the rise of Xi as his primary role is to strengthen CCP rule & ideology.
This explains why its internal security budget is next to its defense budget coupled with increased repression, ill treatment of minorities, great firewall, crackdown etc.
An example is the modern day Gulags in Xinjiang where 1 mn civilians or 10% of the Uighur population are locked up and mistreated.
Contrary to past theory that China can just steal defense and high tech and replicate it- research has shown that China has not been able to do so and is behind.
Paper on this shared by @d_jaishankar mitpressjournals.org/doi/full/10.11…
While they are good companies their association with CCP is starting to pose real market/trust problems in west.
Recent actions against Huawei & call for more scrutiny.
firstpost.com/india/governme…