,
9 tweets,
2 min read
Read on Twitter
Hypocrite!!! In 1998 Nadler Didn't Want Starr Report Released Until Redacted (Video) lidblog.com/hypocrite-nadl… via @yidwithlid
21 years ago Jerrold Nadler was on the house judiciary committee when Ken Starr turned over his report on Bill Clinton. Back then he didn’t want anything released before it was redacted for grand jury testimony and information that would hurt people who weren’t charged.
Oh, and he said it would take some time to do that. In other words, he said the opposite of what he is saying today and an awful like what AG Barr is saying.
Back then Nadler understood that Mueller’s report like any prosecutor’s report was one-sided. He told the Virginia Daily Press “We should always remember this is a prosecutor’s report – by its nature, it’s a one-sided report.”
Mr. Nadler said he was not convinced that Mr. Clinton committed perjury or obstructed justice, but that even if the President did, the offenses would not be impeachable.
So why did Jerrold Nadler say one thing twenty-one years ago and another today? Could it be that Bubba Clinton is a Democrat and Donald Trump a Republican? That’s part of it.
But also consider that that according to Bill Barr’s memo on Mueller’s conclusions, the two years the Democrats spent trying to overturn the 2016 election turns out to a nothing burger with extra cheese
They want to comb through the unredacted report and the millions of backup pages to find every iota of evidence whether true or not they can use to embarrass this president, administration, and or family.
In December 1998 Nadler argued on the House floor saying. “There are clearly some members of the Republican majority who have never accepted the results of the 1992 or 1996 elections,” That same statement could be made about Nadler and his Democratic Party colleagues today.
