,
7 tweets,
2 min read
Read on Twitter
Not implying anything by pointing this out, but this wikipedia user was created a few days after our initial Swiss Post/Scytl findings, and since then they have been very busy ensuring that Scytl's wikipedia page is "objective" and reliably sourced. 
I love the internet.
I like how they decided to fiddle with "Smart City" and "Panopticon" before deciding that Scytl is where they needed to dedicate their time.
This is my favorite attempted edit: en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti…, it was subsequently reverted
You can't just dump all your shoddily sourced, sock puppet talking points in a single update, you have to layer them in over the course of many rewrites.
Maybe I did implying something in that last tweet...oh well
Maybe someone really does care that Scytl's talking points and half-assed interviews with ex-engineers get a fair hearing next to detailed write ups and well-sourced journalism.
