,
4 tweets,
2 min read
Read on Twitter
Theoretically, any third party
In practice, it remains to be seen how many third parties will have available gas at Greifswald entry-point to pump into #OPAL pipeline. Pertinent to mention that OPAL's underutilised capacity was the core argument that Gazprom put forward when 1/
In practice, it remains to be seen how many third parties will have available gas at Greifswald entry-point to pump into #OPAL pipeline. Pertinent to mention that OPAL's underutilised capacity was the core argument that Gazprom put forward when 1/
it fought to be allowed to use more than 50% of OPAL capacity > because there's a track of consistent underutilization of the pipeline, aka of the other 50% capacity that had not been previously exempted.
If the ECJ ruling would stay as such, and if BNetzA wouldn't intervene 2/
If the ECJ ruling would stay as such, and if BNetzA wouldn't intervene 2/
to offset the ECJ decision by providing another exemption, as some suggest (but that has to be subject of Commission's scrutiny too), then we might witness significant underutilization of OPAL capacity
Unless Russia goes for a breakthrough & it'd allow to other companies than 3/
Unless Russia goes for a breakthrough & it'd allow to other companies than 3/
Gazprom to export pipe gas=> for instance #Rosneft, which has been waiting & preparing for this moment (gas exports to Europe) since a while 😎
Hitherto, the base scenario seems to be persistent & significant underutilization of the other 50% of OPAL. But outlook might change 👆
Hitherto, the base scenario seems to be persistent & significant underutilization of the other 50% of OPAL. But outlook might change 👆
