Thread by @HNIJohnMiller

1) Alright. Y'all were overwhelming in favor of it. Give me a second though, I gotta check something.

*shuffling* nope not here...

*papers rustling* nope, nothing here either...

Looks like I'm all out of fucks to give today. Fresh out.

TIME TO READ THE WHISTLEBLOWER SCREECH!!

2) The link so you can follow along on what will doubtlessly be a well thought out and articulate document full of thoroughly researched facts, logical conclusions, and absolutely no partisan hackery.

intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/…

3) Ok, SOME partisan hackery.

4) "This letter is UNCLASSIFIED when separated from the attachment." Ah, thank you for reminding Schiff that he doesn't have to go into the bathroom and furiously text his sexting buddy/WaPo reporter friend snippets from this letter.

5) "Over the course of my duties" that may or may not involve downloading gigabytes of child porn onto government computers "I have received information from multiple US Government officials" youuuu meeaaaaaaan people who are intentionally dicking with you because you're a prick?

6) "This investigation includes, among other things" LOL crowdstrike "pressuring a foreign country to investigate one of the President's main political rivals."

That's adorable, you think a geriatric old man with a temper and groping problem, 'angry hands', is a main rival 🤣🤣

7) "The president's personal lawyer, Mr Guiliani, is a central figure in this effort" Hold up, hold up, hold up. Christopher Steele, is that you? Because this sounds like you. The FBI fired you bro! You can't keep going around calling yourself an intelligence official!

8) "Barr appears to be involved as well" Way to throw that in there so that you can preemptively try and force a recusal, dipshit.

9) "Over the past four months" Lessee here, Sept, Aug, July (when the call took place), June... but the complaint is about the call at the end of July... >.> "more than half a dozen officials" because fuck exact numbers for an official whistleblower complaint amiright?

10) 'Lol bruh sometime over the past I don't know how many months because my life is an endless hell of DRUMPF IS MAH BUSSSSSS a couple guys who's names I'm not sharing told me this shit lololol'

11) "The information provided to me herein was relayed to me in the course of official interagency business." WOW. I had no idea that a random intelligence whistleblower was a FULL ON LEGAL FUCKING SCHOLAR OF CAMPAIGN FINANCE LAWS. He saw crimes where apparently NO ONE ELSE DID.

12) "I was not a direct witness to most of the events described." NOOOOOOOOOOOO SHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIT. "However, I found my colleague's accounts of these events to be credible because, in almost all cases, multiple officials recounted fact patterns that were consistent."

13) So, I'mma stop you right here. So, let's assume benign default course of business stuff's happening. So 'over a half dozen officials' all here, and presumably many see, the exact same thing, no one sees anything wrong except for this motherfucker over here.

14) And now, we have to stop EVERYTHING in order to appease the butthurt feelings of THIS ONE MOTHERFUCKER.

Anyone else seeing anything wrong with this picture?

15) "In addition, a variety of information consistent with these private accounts have been reported publicly." TINFOIL HAT TIME: I wonder of 'officials familiar with the matter' that is INVARIABLY in each and every one of these articles and I WILL FUCKING PROVE IT was THIS GUY.

16) 'Look at me! I can quote laws too!'

17) I'm just getting done with the first page here, JFC.

18) "I am also concerned that these actions pose risks to US national security and undermine the US Government's efforts to deter and counter foreign interference in US elections."

WOW, a fucking PATRIOT who DEFINITELY HAS NOT TAKEN MONEY FROM FOREIGN OWNED NEWSPAPERS FOR LEAKS.

19) "Early in the morning of July 25th, the President spoke by telephone with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. I do not know which side initiated the call."

20) And if you paid any fucking attention out of the horse blinders you wear 24/7 you'd know it was a congratulatory call JUST LIKE THE ONE ON APRIL 21st THAT YOU FUCKING REFERENCED YOU IDIOT.

Please tell me this guy is a specialist in Ukraine. I want to know our IC is that dumb

21) "Multiple White House officials with direct knowledge of the call" WOW this guy's complaint READS ALMOST EXACTLY LIKE A WAPO ARTICLE. ALMOST LIKE A WAPO REPORTER HELPED HIM WRITE THE DAMN COMPLAINT.

22) "The president used the remainder of the call to advance his personal interests." That's adorable.

-initiate or continue an investigation into Hunter Biden
-the DNC servers held by Crowdstrike
-meet or speak with Guiliani and Barr.

So, here's where it gets FUCKING HILARIOUS

23) So, first off, the footnotes show that this dude has NO IDEA WHO THE FUCK CROWDSTRIKE IS. "I don't know why the President associates these servers with Ukraine."

Remember that rule the more the fake news pushes back on something the more likely it is to be true? Pg 1 Google:

24) Another footnote, the dude has no idea of an investigation is happening or not into Hunter, because OBTW he has NO IDEA that Hunter Biden's sugar daddy employer Ballsacksvia Holdings or whatever it was called was under investigation before Biden and Obama shut that shit down.

25) The last bit did happen, except Zelenskyy wanted to talk to Guiliani, and Trump wanted him in touch with Barr specifically.

But, the dude leaves out all of page 2 of the transcript, which is them both bitching about how useless the EU is when it comes to opposing Russia.

26) "The White House officials who told me this information were deeply disturbed by what had transpired in the phone call." Yet YOU'RE the one they have blowing the whistle? Really? This isn't ringing any alarm bells?

27) Seriously. A little bit of common sense here. White House officials who go against Trump invariably get a six figure book deal and weeks of appearances on the MSM. Why would 'over a half dozen' all push this one random dude to do the whistleblowing? Really?

28) Oh, THIS is fucking classic. Ukraine posted a readout of the call, which stated, "Trump expressed his conviction that the new Ukrainian government will be able to... complete the investigation of corruption cases that have held back cooperation between Ukraine and the US."

29) So the fact that this kind of stuff was alluded to has been public for fucking MONTHS and NO ONE gave a fuck. REALLY. REALLY?

30) "Aside from the above mentioned "cases" purportedly dealing with the Biden family and the 2016 election, I was told by the White House officials that no other 'cases' were discussed." LMFAO. Someone didn't tell him about the ambassador talk 🤣 Best proof we have he was set up

31) From the transcript:

Z-dawg: "I would kindly ask you if you have any other information you can provide us, it would be very helpful for the investigation to make sure we administer justice... with regard to the Ambassador to the US from Ukraine." 🤣

32) "Based on my understanding there were approximately a dozen White House officials who listened to the call... as is customary." So if its customary why include this in the complaint? He mentions a state department employee, a West Point grad so military vet appointed in 2018.

33) Brechbuhl, one of Pompeo's people apparently, is the ONLY person mentioned by name in the complaint as having listened in. Probably to prompt Schiff to drag him in front of the House Intel committee. So, expect his name to pop up later.

34) "In the days following the phone call, I learned from multiple US officials that senior White House officials had intervened to 'lock down' all records of the phone call." You mean records like the transcript which was released?

35) And furthermore, GEE I WONDER WHY. NOT LIKE THE FUCKING WAPO ITSELF HADN'T HAD CALL TRANSCRIPTS LEAKED TO THEM TO FUEL FAKE NEWS NARRATIVES.

washingtonpost.com/graphics/2017/…

36) He then complains that the document which was released completely unredacted was stored on a server for classified information despite the fact that it "did not contain anything remotely sensitive from a national security perspective."

HOLD THE FUCK UP. HOLD. THE FUCK. UP.

27) Page one: "I am also concerned that these actions pose risks to US national security."

"did not contain anything remotely sensitive from a national security perspective."

WAT.

38) So then, he does into complaining about meetings with *le gasp* AMBASSADORS AND SPECIAL REPRESENTATIVES.

The scandal. The Trump administration actually conducts international diplomacy and is working to wind down the Ukraine-Russian war (Ukraine civil war my ass).

39) Then he gets into a Hill article about allegations made by this Lutsenko dude, and I'm beginning to think this whistleblower has absolutely no critical thinking skills.

40) Lutsenko alleges:
-Ukraine, not Russia, fucked with the 2016 election.
-The US embassy in Ukraine interfered in anti-corruption probes.
-Biden pressured Poroshenko to fire a prosecutor investigating his son's company. (Biden, again, on video, publicly bragged about this.)

41) The whistleblower states that the revelations came after Porouschekov's defeat in the March 2019 elections was already decided, and that Lutsenko was one of Porojenga's people. AND after Zelenskyy said Lutsenko would be replaced as Prosecutor General.

42) That's right. Lutsenko is the PROSECUTOR GENERAL OF UKRAINE when he was making these allegations, AFTER his boss Poroshankyou was already going down in flames in a landslide election. And all the footnotes are the whistleblower trying to throw as much shade as possible on him

43) Also, ALL OF THESE ALLEGATIONS ARE WHAT WAS TALKED ABOUT ON THE PHONE CALL.

If you take the whistleblower complaint in its entirety, it would SEEM that Trump said to Z-Money, "Hey, this stuff that the former prosecutor general was saying, mind looking into that?" "No sweat."

44) Now I KNOW that a WaPo reporter helped write this whistleblower complaint, because it takes a true Fake News reporter to be able to write this contradictory of a piece.

45) Screams about Marie Yovanovitch, the US ambassador to Ukraine, being recalled and replaced in May, looping her into the allegations regarding Ukrainian interference in the 2016 elections. Funny shit.

46) Ah, here's a funny bit. Apparently finding out what REALLY happened with 2016 elections are investigations that would help Trump in 2020, thus the foundation of this complaint.

As if Mueller's 'investigation' wasnt already a huge help in that regard 🤣 Schiff: "Mueller who?"

47) "Multiple US officials" SERIOUSLY. IS THIS A WHISTLEBLOWER COMPLAINT OR A WAPO ARTICLE? "were deeply concerned" not enough to file a whistleblower complaint, unlike some people >.> "circumvention of national security decisionmaking processes" SO IS THIS OR IS THIS NOT NATSEC?

48) "During this same timeframe multiple US officials" GIVE US NUMBERS OR GIVE US FAKE NEWS. YOU'RE GIVING US FAKE NEWS "told me that the Ukrainian leadership was led to believe" so basically you have no exact quotes to offer us, and we're relying totally on hearsay.

49) "that a meeting or phone call... would depend on Zelenskyy showing willingness to 'play ball'"

"(Note: This was the general understanding of the state of affairs conveyed to me by US officials... I do not know who delivered this message to Ukrainian leadership or when.)"

50) So you know NOTHING short of what was told to you literally fucking THIRD HAND, as its not the people YOU were talking to who witnessed any of this? They told this to you thirdhand?

THIS IS LITERALLY HEARSAY OF HEARSAY. ALL OF THIS.

51) "Shortly after Zelenskyy's inauguration, it was publicly reported that Guiliani met with two other Ukrainian officials: Ukraine's special anticorruption prosecutor and a former Ukrainian diplomat... both are allies to Lutosenko and made similar allegations." REALLY.

52) So it wasn't just UKRAINES PROSECUTOR GENERAL but also one of their ANTICORRUPTION PROSECUTORS and a FORMER DIPLOMAT who also made the exact same fucking allegations about shenanigans from the Obama administration and the embassy?!? WAY TO BURY THAT LEAD WAPO REPORTER.

53) The appendix is fucking hilarious. He reveals that the computer system for storing claffieid materials has been used for politically sensitive stuff before, and refuses to even MENTION the fact that this shit was getting leaked.

54) My money says that this motherfucker is the exact person that leaked the Australian and Mexican phone calls to the WaPo in 2017. GUARANFUCKINGTEED.

55) He's trying desperately to tie Ukraine aid to this, and admits he has NO WAY OF KNOWING IF ITS ACTUALLY CONNECTED. "I do not know definitively whether the below-mentioned decisions are part of the broader efforts I describe."

56) To top it off, the final page, in 2 paragraphs the whistleblower says "I do not know" three separate times.

THAT BASICALLY SUMS THIS ENTIRE FUCKING DOCUMENT UP.

57) This motherfucker does not know shit about the policy decisions being made, he does now know specifically what was said, why it was said, when it was said, what context it was said, what was alluded to, ANYTHING.

BUT THERES A HEARING GOING ON RIGHT NOW OVER IT.

58) I'm done. Out. This is a piece of shit. /end