, 168 tweets, 825 min read
Last year, with help of @denis_campbell @ObserverUK, I shared #HVreEndangered. This was an attempt to answer Q, as accurately as possible, how many health visitors there were in England. You can read more abt 2018 attempt/results⬇️. In late Feb 2019 I started #HVreEndangeredv2 1/
I contacted each local authority in England and asked them 5 questions ⬇️. I also gave a note of clarity about what I was asking for ⬇️. As the replies came in, I added them to a spreadsheet. In the run up to #CPHVA19, I wanted to share the results #HVreEndangeredv2 2/
I'm going to do my best to share the results on Twitter over the next few days, going through local authorities in alphabetical order. I'll be referencing the source for what I say, and am more than happy to be corrected for any errors/inaccuracies! #HVreEndangeredv2 3/
I'll probably need to add some notes as I go. Heres the first 2:
(*1) Some providers provide health visitors to more than 1 local authority, therefore you can't just divide the number of children <5 by the number of health visitors to get an average caseload #HVreEndangeredv2 4/
(*2) In situations where the local authority didn't provide health visitor numbers for NHS organisations, I used the data from @NHSDigital Feb19 (files.digital.nhs.uk/E5/186B8F/NHS%…) & compared with Feb18 (files.digital.nhs.uk/DD/3AAC9D/NHS%…) #HVreEndangeredv2 /5
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Barking & Dagenham @lbbdcouncil
Provider - @NELFT (*1)
Number of HVs in provider = 175 (*2) (⬇️15.2 since Feb2018)
Number of <5yrs = 23,934
6/
@lbbdcouncil @NELFT #HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Barnet @BarnetCouncil
I didn't appear to get a response to my FoI 😢
7/
@lbbdcouncil @NELFT @BarnetCouncil #HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Barnsley @BarnsleyCouncil
Provider - @BarnsleyCouncil
Number of HVs in provider = 51.31 (⬇️12.47 since June18)
Number of <5yrs = 14,373
Average caseload = 280 <5s/HV
8/
@lbbdcouncil @NELFT @BarnetCouncil @BarnsleyCouncil #HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Bath and North East Somerset @bathnes
Provider - @VirginCare
Number of HVs in provider = 37.4
Number of <5yrs = 9,486
Average caseload = 253 <5s/HV
9/
@lbbdcouncil @NELFT @BarnetCouncil @BarnsleyCouncil @bathnes @VirginCare #HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Bedford Borough @BedfordTweets
Provider - @ccs_nhst
Number of HVs in provider = 25.93
Number of <5yrs = 11,120
Average caseload = 429 <5s/HV
10/
@lbbdcouncil @NELFT @BarnetCouncil @BarnsleyCouncil @bathnes @VirginCare @BedfordTweets @ccs_nhst #HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Bexley @LBofBexley
Provider - @bromleyhcare (CIC)
Number of HVs in provider = 30.9
Number of <5yrs = 19,438
Average caseload = 629 <5s/HV
11/
@lbbdcouncil @NELFT @BarnetCouncil @BarnsleyCouncil @bathnes @VirginCare @BedfordTweets @ccs_nhst @LBofBexley @bromleyhcare #HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Birmingham City @BhamCityCouncil
Provider - @bhamcommunity
Number of HVs in provider = 227.4 (*2) (0.08⬇️ since Feb2018)
Number of <5yrs = 85,800
Average caseload = 378 <5s/HV
12/
@lbbdcouncil @NELFT @BarnetCouncil @BarnsleyCouncil @bathnes @VirginCare @BedfordTweets @ccs_nhst @LBofBexley @bromleyhcare @BhamCityCouncil @bhamcommunity @blackburndarwen @BpoolCouncil @boltoncouncil @boltonnhsft #HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Bournemouth, Dorset & Poole @BCPCouncil
Provider - @DorsetHealth
Number of HVs in provider = 129 (*2) (19.72⬇️ since Feb2018)
Number of <5yrs = 37,912
Average caseload = 294 <5s/HV
16/
I’ve not had much chance today to continue yesterday’s first day of #HVreEndangeredv2. I did want to emphasise a very important issue however, that of ‘average caseloads’. I’ve tried to note these where I think I’m able to. 30/
For a long time @Unite_CPHVA has argued that the maximum caseload for a full time health visitor (irrespective of skill mix) should be 250 children<5. More recently I understand @iHealthVisiting has also taken up this maximum figure. #HVreEndangeredv2 31/
There’s a few problems with average caseloads including which of the reported health visitors actually work as a caseload holding health visitor. I’ll use @BCPCouncil as an example (see tweet 16/) #HVreEndangeredv2 32/
On figures I’ve reported, their average=294. This is with @NHSDigital figure of 129 HVs. But this is 113 band6 & 16 band7. All of them could hold a caseload, or just some. If we guessed only B6 had caseloads their average figure would ⬆️42 children to 335 #HVreEndangeredv2 33/
@NHSDigital #HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Cheshire West and Chester Council @Go_CheshireWest
Provider - @cwpnhs
Number of HVs in provider = 59.81 (⬇️6.44 since Feb18) (*2)
Number of <5yrs = 18,765
Average caseload = 314 <5s/HV
34/
@NHSDigital @Go_CheshireWest @cwpnhs #HVreEndangeredv2
LA - City of York @CityofYork
Provider - @CityofYork
Number of HVs in provider = 29
Number of <5yrs = 9,822
Average caseload = 339 <5s/HV
35/
@NHSDigital @Go_CheshireWest @cwpnhs @CityofYork #HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Cornwall @CornwallCouncil
Provider - @CornwallFT (till 01/04/19 then @CornwallCouncil)
Number of HVs in provider = 76.75
Number of <5yrs = 28,787
Average caseload = 375 <5s/HV
36/
@NHSDigital @Go_CheshireWest @cwpnhs @CityofYork @CornwallCouncil @CornwallFT #HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Coventry City @coventrycc
Provider - @nhsswft
Number of HVs in provider = 189.61 (⬆️55.23 since Feb18)
Number of <5yrs = 23,068
Average caseload = ??? <5s/HV (*1)
37/
@NHSDigital @Go_CheshireWest @cwpnhs @CityofYork @CornwallCouncil @CornwallFT @coventrycc @nhsswft #HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Croydon @yourcroydon
Provider - @croydonhealth
Number of HVs in provider = 49.76
Number of <5yrs = 28,918
Average caseload = 581 <5s/HV
38/
@NHSDigital @Go_CheshireWest @cwpnhs @CityofYork @CornwallCouncil @CornwallFT @coventrycc @nhsswft @yourcroydon @croydonhealth @CumbriaCC #HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Darlington Borough @darlingtonbc
Provider - @HarrogateNHSFT
Number of HVs in provider = 379.98 (⬆️109.60 since Feb18) (*1)
Number of <5yrs = 5,917
Average caseload = ??? <5s/HV
40/
@NHSDigital @Go_CheshireWest @cwpnhs @CityofYork @CornwallCouncil @CornwallFT @coventrycc @nhsswft @yourcroydon @croydonhealth @CumbriaCC @darlingtonbc @HarrogateNHSFT #HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Derby City @DerbyCC
Provider - @derbyshcft
Number of HVs in provider = 57.6
Number of <5yrs = 16,674
Average caseload = 289 <5s/HV
41/
@NHSDigital @Go_CheshireWest @cwpnhs @CityofYork @CornwallCouncil @CornwallFT @coventrycc @nhsswft @yourcroydon @croydonhealth @CumbriaCC @darlingtonbc @HarrogateNHSFT @DerbyCC @derbyshcft @Derbyshirecc @DCHStrust @ripplezcic @DevonCC @VirginCare @MyDoncaster @DorsetCouncilUK @DorsetHealth @dudleymbc @DurhamCouncil @EalingCouncil @CLCHNHSTrust @East_Riding @HumberNHSFT @EastSussexCC @ESHTNHS @EnfieldCouncil @BEHMHTNHS @Essex_CC @barnardos ⬆️@Essex_CC response is interesting, including it highlighting number of vacancies. (*3) I havent taken this into account for any of 'average caseload' results as not many reported this (TBF I didnt ask). Taking this into account average caseload ⬆️49 (=304) #HVreEndangeredv2 53/
My 'I doubt it' isn't really cynicism as they refused to share the data in 2018. This is an example where the public cannot hold a local authority to account with how it spends it's money because the company it pays this public money refuses to share the data. #HVreEndangered 69/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Isle of Wight @iwight
Provider - @IoWNHSTrust
Number of HVs in provider = 25.3
Number of <5yrs = 5,609
Average caseload = 222 <5s/HV
70/
@iwight @IoWNHSTrust #HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Islington @IslingtonBC
Provider - @WhitHealth (*1)
Number of HVs in provider = 104.53 (⬇️7.35 since Feb2018)
Number of <5yrs = 13,127
Average caseload = ??? <5s/HV
71/
@iwight @IoWNHSTrust @IslingtonBC @WhitHealth #HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Kensington & Chelsea @RBKC
Provider - @CLCHNHSTrust (*1)
Number of HVs in provider = 274.82 (⬆️7.69 since Feb2018)
Number of <5yrs = 8,223
Average caseload = ??? <5s/HV
72/
@iwight @IoWNHSTrust @IslingtonBC @WhitHealth @RBKC @CLCHNHSTrust #HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Kent County @Kent_cc
Provider - @NHSKentCHFT
Number of HVs in provider = 195.87
Number of <5yrs = 91,425
Average caseload = 467 <5s/HV
73/
@iwight @IoWNHSTrust @IslingtonBC @WhitHealth @RBKC @CLCHNHSTrust @Kent_cc @NHSKentCHFT #HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Kingston Upon Thames @RBKingston
Provider - @_yourhealthcare
Number of HVs in provider = 21.31
Number of <5yrs = 11,373
Average caseload = 534 <5s/HV
74/
@iwight @IoWNHSTrust @IslingtonBC @WhitHealth @RBKC @CLCHNHSTrust @Kent_cc @NHSKentCHFT @RBKingston @_yourhealthcare #HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Kirklees Borough @KirkleesCouncil
Provider - @locala
Number of HVs in provider = ?⬇️
Number of <5yrs = ?⬇️27,446
Average caseload = ??? <5s/HV
75/
@iwight @IoWNHSTrust @IslingtonBC @WhitHealth @RBKC @CLCHNHSTrust @Kent_cc @NHSKentCHFT @RBKingston @_yourhealthcare @KirkleesCouncil @locala #HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Knowsley Borough @KnowsleyCouncil
Provider - @PennineCareNHS
Number of HVs in provider = 52.32
Number of <5yrs = 10,076
Average caseload = 193 <5s/HV
76/
@iwight @IoWNHSTrust @IslingtonBC @WhitHealth @RBKC @CLCHNHSTrust @Kent_cc @NHSKentCHFT @RBKingston @_yourhealthcare @KirkleesCouncil @locala @KnowsleyCouncil @PennineCareNHS #HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Lambeth @lambeth_council
Provider - @EvelinaLondon (part of @GSTTnhs) (*1)
Number of HVs in provider = 117.06 (⬇️14.0 since Feb2018)
Number of <5yrs = 19,700
Average caseload = ??? <5s/HV
77/
@iwight @IoWNHSTrust @IslingtonBC @WhitHealth @RBKC @CLCHNHSTrust @Kent_cc @NHSKentCHFT @RBKingston @_yourhealthcare @KirkleesCouncil @locala @KnowsleyCouncil @PennineCareNHS @lambeth_council @EvelinaLondon @GSTTnhs #HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Lancashire County @LancashireCC
Provider - Was N Lancs @BlackpoolHosp - C&E Lancs (Lancashire Care now) @LSCFT_NHS Now @VirginCare (virgincare.co.uk/news/new-partn…)
Number of HVs in provider = ??.??
Number of <5yrs = ??,???
Average caseload = ??? <5s/HV
🤷‍♂️
78/
@iwight @IoWNHSTrust @IslingtonBC @WhitHealth @RBKC @CLCHNHSTrust @Kent_cc @NHSKentCHFT @RBKingston @_yourhealthcare @KirkleesCouncil @locala @KnowsleyCouncil @PennineCareNHS @lambeth_council @EvelinaLondon @GSTTnhs @LancashireCC @BlackpoolHosp @LSCFT_NHS @VirginCare @LeedsCC_News @LCHNHSTrust @Leicester_News @LPTnhs @LeicsCountyHall @LewishamCouncil @LG_NHS (*5) Response @LewishamCouncil highlights 1 of probs that other councils came across, them not appearing to know they are responsible for commissioning health visiting services. Having said that, at least Lewisham was 'helpful' by telling me who provider is #HVreEndangeredv2 83/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Rotherham Borough @RMBCPress
Provider - @RotherhamNHS_FT
Number of HVs in provider = 46.05 (⬇️3.43 since Feb 2018)
Number of <5yrs = 15,584
Average caseload = 338 <5s/HV
115/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Rutland County @rutlandcouncil
Provider - @LPTnhs (*1)
Number of HVs in provider = 195.26 (⬇️10.10 since Feb 2018)
Number of <5yrs = 1,855
Average caseload = ??? <5s/HV
116/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Salford City @SalfordCouncil
Provider - @SalfordRoyalNHS
Number of HVs in provider = 56.14 (⬇️1.33 since Feb 2018)
Number of <5yrs = 21,079
Average caseload = 375 <5s/HV
117/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Sandwell Borough @sandwellcouncil
Provider - @SWBHnhs
Number of HVs in provider = 83.33
Number of <5yrs = 24,286
Average caseload =291 <5s/HV
118/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Sefton Borough @seftoncouncil
Provider - @NWBoroughsNHS
Number of HVs in provider = 130.22 (⬇️10.55 since Feb 2018)
Number of <5yrs = 14,596
Average caseload = ??? <5s/HV
119/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Sheffield City @SheffCouncil
Provider - @SheffChildrens
Number of HVs in provider = 98.23 (⬇️7.15 since Feb 2018)
Number of <5yrs = 32,758
Average caseload =333 <5s/HV
120/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Shropshire @ShropCouncil
Provider - @ShropCommHealth
Number of HVs in provider = 40.3
Number of <5yrs = 14,132
Average caseload = 351 <5s/HV
121/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Slough Borough @SloughCouncil
Provider - @Solutions4H
Number of HVs in provider = 24.8 ➡️28.8
Number of <5yrs = 12,569
Average caseload = 507 (?➡️436?) <5s/HV
122/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Solihull Borough @SolihullCouncil
Provider - @nhsswft
Number of HVs in provider = 32.10
Number of <5yrs = 12,335
Average caseload = 384 <5s/HV
123/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Somerset County @SomersetCouncil
Provider - @SomParNHS
Number of HVs in provider = 93.80 (⬇️19.01 since Feb 2018)
Number of <5yrs = 29,004
Average caseload = 309 <5s/HV
124/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - South Gloucestershire @sgloscouncil
Provider - @SironaCIC
Number of HVs in provider = ??.?? (*4) I asked for staff data from @SironaCIC in 2018 and I believe I never got a response ⬇️.
Number of <5yrs = 16,300
Average caseload = ??? <5s/HV
125/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - South Tyneside Borough @STCouncil_News
Provider - @STSFTrust
Number of HVs in provider = 26.35
Number of <5yrs = 8,300
Average caseload =315 <5s/HV
126/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Southampton City @SouthamptonCC
Provider - @SolentNHSTrust
Number of HVs in provider = 40.15
Number of <5yrs = 15,772
Average caseload = 393 <5s/HV
127/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Southend-on-Sea Borough @SouthendBC
Provider - @EPUTNHS
Number of HVs in provider = 34.81 (⬇️ 80.23 since Feb 2018)
Number of <5yrs = 11,304
Average caseload = ??? <5s/HV
128/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Southwark @lb_southwark
Provider - @EvelinaLondon (part of @GSTTnhs) (*1) (see 77/)
Number of HVs in provider = 117.06 (⬇️14.0 since Feb2018)
Number of <5yrs = 20,500
Average caseload = ??? <5s/HV
129/
(*5) Like in the response from @lb_southwark ⬆️, I do find it fascinating that some local authorities report they do not know how many children under 5 they have. How on earth can they commission health visiting services without this key bit of information? #HVreEndangeredv2 130/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - St Helens Borough @sthelenscouncil
Provider - @NWBoroughsNHS (*1) (see 119/)
Number of HVs in provider = 130.22 (⬇️10.55 since Feb 2018)
Number of <5yrs = 10,282
Average caseload = ??? <5s/HV
131/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Staffordshire County @StaffordshireCC
Provider - @mpftnhs
Number of HVs in provider = 93.28
Number of <5yrs = 44,684
Average caseload = 479 <5s/HV
132/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Stockport Borough @StockportMBC
Provider - @StockportNHS
Number of HVs in provider = 66.66
Number of <5yrs = 15,241
Average caseload = 229 <5s/HV
133/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Stockton-on-Tees Borough @stocktoncouncil
Provider - @HarrogateNHSFT
Number of HVs in provider = 37.88
Number of <5yrs = 12,017
Average caseload = 317 <5s/HV
134/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Stoke-on-Trent City @SoTCityCouncil
Provider - ???? The council refused to respond to my FoI despite the clarification I provided about them being responsible for commissioning the service.
135/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Suffolk County @suffolkcc
Provider - @suffolkcc
Number of HVs in provider = 81.07
Number of <5yrs = 32,830
Average caseload = 405 <5s/HV
136/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Sunderland City @SunderlandUK
Provider - @HarrogateNHSFT
Number of HVs in provider = 56.04
Number of <5yrs = 14,570
Average caseload = 260 <5s/HV
137/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Surrey County @SurreyCouncil
Provider - @CFHS_Surrey
Number of HVs in provider = 85.96
Number of <5yrs = 70,074
Average caseload = 815 <5s/HV
138/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Sutton @SuttonCouncil
Provider - @royalmarsdenNHS (*Transfer to @SuttonCouncil by 1 April 2019)
Number of HVs in provider = 28
Number of <5yrs = 13,900
Average caseload = 496 <5s/HV
139/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Swindon @SwindonCouncil
Provider - @SwindonCouncil
Number of HVs in provider = 30.19
Number of <5yrs = 14,643
Average caseload = 485 <5s/HV
140/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Tameside Borough @TamesideCouncil
Provider - @tandgicft
Number of HVs in provider = 58.46 (⬇️3.83 since Feb 2018)
Number of <5yrs = 12,731
Average caseload = 218 <5s/HV
141/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Telford & Wrekin @TelfordWrekin
Provider - @ShropCommHealth
Number of HVs in provider = 40.2
Number of <5yrs = 11,022
Average caseload = 274 <5s/HV
142/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Thurrock @thurrockcouncil
Provider - @NELFT
Number of HVs in provider = 31.64
Number of <5yrs = 12,802
Average caseload = 405 <5s/HV
143/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Torbay @Torbay_Council
Provider - @TorbaySDevonNHS
Number of HVs in provider = 35.37 (⬇️ 5.38 since Feb 2018)
Number of <5yrs = 6,918
Average caseload = 196 <5s/HV
144/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Tower Hamlets @TowerHamletsNow
Provider - @THGPCareGroup
Number of HVs in provider = 71.3
Number of <5yrs = 22,700
Average caseload = 318 <5s/HV
145/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Trafford Borough @TraffordCouncil
Provider - @PennineCareNHS (*1) (see 114/)
Number of HVs in provider = 142.27 (⬇️6.89 since Feb 2018)
Number of <5yrs = 14,853
Average caseload = ??? <5s/HV
146/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Wakefield City @MyWakefield
Provider - @BDCFT
Number of HVs in provider = 74.77
Number of <5yrs = 20,985
Average caseload = 281 <5s/HV
147/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Walsall Borough @WalsallCouncil
Provider - @WalsallHcareNHS
Number of HVs in provider = 52.85 (⬇️ 2.28 since Feb 2018)
Number of <5yrs = 19,650
Average caseload = 372 <5s/HV
148/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Waltham Forrest @wfcouncil
Provider - @NELFT
Number of HVs in provider = 43.8
Number of <5yrs = 21,802
Average caseload = 498 <5s/HV
149/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Wandsworth @wandbc
Provider - @CLCHNHSTrust (*1 see 19/ 48/52/ 72/ 89/)
Number of HVs in provider = 274.82 (⬆️7.69 since Feb2018)
Number of <5yrs = 22,700
Average caseload = ??? <5s/HV
150/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Warrington Borough @WarringtonBC
Provider - @Bridgewater_NHS
Number of HVs in provider = 39.5
Number of <5yrs = 12,206
Average caseload = 309 <5s/HV
151/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Warwickshire County @Warwickshire_CC
Provider - @nhsswft
Number of HVs in provider = ?98?
Number of <5yrs = 31,476
Average caseload = 321 <5s/HV
152/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - West Berkshire @WestBerkshire
Provider - @BHFT (*1) (see 17/ 110/)
Number of HVs in provider = 75.62 (⬇️8.32 since Feb 2018)
Number of <5yrs = 9,100
Average caseload = ??? <5s/HV
153/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - West Sussex County @WSCCNews
Provider - @nhs_sct
Number of HVs in provider = 98.68
Number of <5yrs = 46,821
Average caseload = 474 <5s/HV
154/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Westminster @CityWestminster
Provider - @CLCHNHSTrust
Number of HVs in provider = 19.44
Number of <5yrs = 10,762
Average caseload = 554 <5s/HV
155/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Wigan Borough @WiganCouncil
Provider - @Bridgewater_NHS (*1) (see 104/) (@WWLNHS from 1 April 2019)
Number of HVs in provider = 186.74 (⬇️19.0 since Feb 2018)
Number of <5yrs = 18,510
Average caseload = ??? <5s/HV
156/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Wiltshire @wiltscouncil
Provider - @VirginCare
Number of HVs in provider = 57.23
Number of <5yrs = 27,307
Average caseload = 477 <5s/HV
157/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Windsor & Maidenhead Borough @RBWM
Provider - @AforChildren (*1) (see 113/)
Number of HVs in provider = 22.5
Number of <5yrs = 8,988
Average caseload = 399 <5s/HV
158/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Wirral Borough @WirralCouncil
Provider - @wirralct (*1) (see 29/)
Number of HVs in provider = 121.36 (⬇️12.8 since Feb 2018)
Number of <5yrs = 18,051
Average caseload = ??? <5s/HV
159/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Wokingham Borough @WokinghamBC
Provider - @BHFT
Number of HVs in provider = 14.0
Number of <5yrs = 12,140
Average caseload = 867 <5s/HV
160/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Wolverhampton City @WolvesCouncil
Provider - They don’t know
Number of HVs in provider = ??.??
Number of <5yrs = 18,026
Average caseload = ??? <5s/HV
161/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - Worcestershire County @WorcsCCC
Provider - @WorcsHealthCare
Number of HVs in provider = 79.68 (⬇️3.98 since Feb 2018)
Number of <5yrs = 31,867
Average caseload = 400 <5s/HV
162/
#HVreEndangeredv2
LA - North East Lincolnshire @NELCouncil
Provider - @NELCouncil
Number of HVs in provider = 28.61
Number of <5yrs = 8,270
Average caseload = 289 <5s/HV
163/ (see 95/)
According to #HVreEndangeredv2 data as it stands, there’s been 18 changes to providers between Feb18 and Feb19(ish). This includes:
1 NHS merger,
10 NHS➡️NHS,
1 NHS➡️private,
1 NHS➡️Council,
1 NHS➡️SE/CIC
164/
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with David Munday

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!