Thread by @sunnshiiny

@NCLN it’s interesting you copied only one individual and several news outlets in your concern for POC.

Why that individual? There are many more individuals much more focussed on racism that would be appropriate to copy to amplify your projection and accusations.

Thanks for letting the cat out of the bag. You’ve linked and confirmed Kinsella to this political smear campaign and revealed he is directly involved in propagating and amplifying this narrative.

Made much more interesting since I’m aware of a journalist who has a copy of a time stamped article Kinsella published about the scandal two hours after the original was published by American news outlet, Time.

So is this confirmation that Green Party is helping CPC get elected, or is Kinsella working for two opposing political parties during the same campaign without revealing that information to Greens? We have confirmation he was working with May from May herself.

You know the optics of a political mercenary, working for two supposedly ideologically opposed political parties simultaneously, during an election, is troublesome. So I’m surprised that you would so casually attach Kinsella’s name to your tweet. A novice’s error I’m sure.

But a major one.

So to summarize:

An anti-choice organization (NCLN), linked to support of conservative political party (CPC), is amplifying smear propaganda, with an attached list of media outlets and a political operative with the apt self styled moniker “Prince of Darkness”

Warren Kinsella, aka “Prince of Darkness,” has publicly been identified as the political muscle behind the current Green Party leader. Advising on political strategy and “protecting” the GPC leader, Elizabeth May from political attacks.

May has since publicly distanced herself from Mr. Kinsella, but it was already publicly identified that Kinsella was hired as a political weapon by the Greens to protect their leader’s appeal to climate action voters.

The problem is, climate action was not enough of a wedge issue to split the vote enough. Neither the NDP or Green policies are inspirational enough to draw support for their plans from Liberal supporters.

The strategy resulted in vote splitting between NDP and GPC, rather than impacting Liberal support. As GPC rose in popularity, NDP popularity fell correspondingly.

Not quite the effect on Liberal election chances the strategy was intended to make.

Your inclusion of Kinsella, at the exclusion of all other individual media contacts provides a clue to who Kinsella is currently assisting. CPC.

Scheer has already publicly admitted it was CPC member who released the brief video of the PM attached to the smear campaign.

What was questionable efficiency to write and publish a Canadian follow up to the original within 2 hours of notification of the article’s existence, is now clearly suspect of being a coordinated smear campaign.

The new Election Act aims to prevent clearly biased propaganda from being offered as national news. As registered third parties it would be ill advised for any national media to publish the original accusation and obvious smear. No media in Canada would touch after writ dropped.

For fear of being accused of interference in the federal election, Canadian media were presumably offered the evidence or bypassed altogether. But once the smear was in the public sphere, it was almost immediately amplified by a prepared author. Mr. Kinsella, in Postmedia.

I’m sure Mr. Kinsella is a talented writer. And a talented pundit. But it is extremely unlikely he could synthesize the Times article and produce one of his own within 2 hours in a Canadian medium unless he had prior notice that the information was going to be published.

Confirmation that the campaign to smear the PM originates from CPC was made by Acheer himself. So the involvement of Mr. Kinsella is quite the scandal.

A political operative publicly identified as working for two supposed ideologically opposed parties within a couple months.

Your tweet provides a quandary for consideration. May didn’t distance herself until July 30, 2019. By Sept 18, after CPC was bleeding voter support heavily for days, the Times publishes a smear of Canadian PM. Kinsella is identified working to assist CPC about 45 days later.

A short time frame for a supposedly Liberal political pundit to switch sides and start shilling for Conservatives.

What’s interesting is May’s immediate reaction upon learning of the information.

Condemnation, and a political jab at Trudeau’s leadership.

NDP Jagmeet Singh is no different. While speaking at an engagement the Times story broke. Singh is asked for a reaction. Again, condemnation with the addition of a jab at the PM’s leadership

Your tweet helps tie all those events together. A conservative special interest group amplifying a smear unrelated to their cause and copying a Green Party hired pundit and claiming Liberal party ideology.

It sticks out like flies in butter or fish on a tree top.

It is weird that you name Kinsella. It’s an anomaly, made more strange by the absence of other non related issues on your timeline.

Indicative of a coordinated campaign.

A coordinated international smear campaign by Kinsella, who’s openly trying to impact LPC popular support through negative campaigning, well known as the “Prince of Darkness,” is working for GPC & CPC, at virtually the same time, with the same expected outcome. A CPC win.

Confirmation GPC and CPC are using the same political mercenary to achieve the same political outcome. Removal of Trudeau and LPC.

One might call that a partnership.