theoutline.com/post/2156/mic-…
then two years later this one
huffpost.com/entry/mic-layo…
One of the videos you probably saw from me was inside Mic's headquarters
So yes, I'm speaking from experience having been an insider to these companies
These companies don't employ fact checkers
Just as a tweet is a candid thought so are most youtube videos
That has no bearing on the value of establishment news and if you look at what I'm developing youd see that
subverse.net
its cheaper and more lucrative to rewrite outrage than it is to send someone to hong kong.
I just sent someone to hong kong
Dave rubin does not host a behind the scenes vlog, he runs a TV style talk show
It seems like your recent article is mostly just about me
We recently broke the crowd investment record raising 1M$ in 22 hours
We have contracted progressives and establishment journalists for news coverage
Subverse is editorially independent from me and I have no say in what they cover
CNN meanwhile has direct intervention from the president and has shift almost exclusively to covering Trump
"mission driven storytelling"
Thats what the marketing people call it
npr.org/2015/04/25/402…
The general capitalization of news has resulted in ragebait for clicks
These companies then look for partisan activists who can write anger inducing content because its cheap, no field costs, high virality, high profit
I tell you this as an involved expert and insider, as a member of ONA, and past speaker at Columbia, NYU, and ONA events
everyone is tired of cancel culture, that is not reactionary