They then claim they did not report what they clearly did report
The article Jack cited even says "they typically communicated in English"
Clear as fucking day
Journalism is dead
What am I missing here??
Jack said foreign policy goals
NYT says Giuliani
Jack broadened what Giuliani was doing
Giuliani was pushing Trump's foreign policy goals
NYT then takes Jack's tweet to mean EVERY foreign policy goal
People need to get specific
Jack is trying to highlight that Vindman was advising a foreign country how to counter SPECIFIC foreign policy goals instead of just saying Giuliani, Trumps lawyer
NYT took it literally to mean EVERY goal and said they never said that