, 10 tweets, 8 min read
1/9

@rabihmgeha shared a fantastic approach to positive BCx! I use a similar schema, but add ‘Questions to ask the lab/what to do next?’ since #ID usually doesn’t get the ‘critical result’ call from micro, and I want to empower those who do with actionable knowledge.
2/

I arrange the potential Gram stain results that one can be called w/ as follows: Gram(+) cocci, Gram(+) rods, Gram(–) rods, Gram(–) cocci, yeast. Gram(+) cocci are grouped by ‘morphology’ since the lab usually tells you this: clusters, pairs, chains, etc. Fill in with orgs.
3/

Like @rabihmgeha's schema, the orgs are deliberately ordered this way: Gram(+) orgs are often [skin] contaminants, Gram(–) orgs & yeast are not. Remember that clinician adjudication is the ‘gold standard’ for deciding what is a contaminant!
4/

Now, w/ the bugs organized, when you get that call from the micro lab, here are 3 questions to ask yourself/the lab:
1) Number of positive bottles/cultures and time to positivity?
2) ‘Shape’ of the bacteria?
3) Aerobic or anaerobic bottle?

Let’s break these questions down.
5/

Fewer positive cultures & longer time to positivity suggests a contaminant. Apply Q1) to Gram(+) orgs. Time to positivity tough to interpret unless extreme (ex. 8h v 48h). Can use # of positive cx fact to your advantage – before abx, obtain more cx & increase the denominator!
6/

Apply Q2) to Gram(+) rods since their shapes are so distinct. There are some uniquely shaped Gram(–) rods too, but rare (think Fusobacterium). Here’s a comparative chart of GPRs to illustrate. A great reason to go to micro lab and review the Gram stain!
7/

Apply Q3) to Gram(+) rods & perhaps Gram(–) rods too. For GPRs, preferential growth in the aerobic v anaerobic bottle helps organize the ‘shape’ chart. Ex: while you await speciation for that aerobic box car shaped GPR, these clues suggest Bacillus, usually a contaminant!
8/

For Gram(–) rods, the pearl is that Pseudomonas is a ‘strict’ aerobe and ought to grow preferentially in the aerobic bottle – thus, a GNR that grows in the anaerobic bottle first is less likely Pseudomonas. Of course, always exceptions to these pearls, so await speciation!
9/9

Let’s put all this together in a final summary chart.

I have to give credit to @colleenkraftMD for teaching me this approach as a fellow! What do you think #IDTwitter? @CarlosdelRio7 @Ahmed_HBabiker @serotavirus @natesumMRSA @CPSolvers
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with Varun Phadke

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!