On just about a weekly basis @MarkSZaidEsq and I spend time defending clients before U.S. Government agencies on concerns of foreign loyalties or interests. It is a critical part of any assessment of any individual seeking to hold a security clearance. “Dual loyalty” is something
we contend with on a regular basis. Needless to say, when it comes to national security the government always errs on the side of caution. If they believe the person is too exposed to foreign interests, the person is not getting a clearance.
That’s what makes the attacks
That’s what makes the attacks
over the last 12 hours by the likes of @IngrahamAngle @RepSeanDuffy @kilmeade (none of whom, as far as I know, have ever held a clearance) and others so offensive. LTC Vindman was already vetted (more than once) on these very issues, and the vetting for someone with an
intelligence posting would no doubt have required the highest clearance eligibility (TS/SCI), necessitating not only the standard background check but also more than likely a full scope polygraph (the one where they grill you on your entire life).
Vindman passed this vetting.
Vindman passed this vetting.
Despite that fact, because they are so desperate to smear and attack anyone who dares testify against the president, these media figures are attacking Vindman with unsubstantiated suggestions of dual loyalty to Ukraine.
For shame, all of you. Have you no sense of decency? /end
For shame, all of you. Have you no sense of decency? /end
