As I've discussed earlier, best guess is that Macmillan thinks each book purchased gets checked out 52 times.
EVEN IF a book were popular enough to be continuously checked out for 2 years (most books aren't that popular for that long) the way most systems are set up, you can't hit 52 in 2 years.
SEVENTY NINE PERCENT.
The average Macmillan title checked out 11.5 times before needed to be repurchased.
Libraries paid $60 for 11.5 checkouts
75% of Macmillans titles circed for 8.3 times.
Libraries paid $60 for 8.3 checkouts.
Libraries are paying an average of $5.20-$7.22 per checkout.
Macmillan sells its Tor novellas to private consumers for $3.99
Hardcover frontlist is the most expensive and is usually $14.99
I have no idea what their average ebook sale is. But I'm guessing it's around the same price libraries are paying on a per check-out basis.
Maaaaaybe 3 people can check out 1 ebook during an 8 week period.
But 4 people would have to purchase the book at $15 to make up for 1 lost library sale.
But it's seriously fucking over libraries (guaranteed repeat customers!) people who use libraries, and their authors.
@JenReadsRomance has been spending A LOT of time this year looking at how ebook price effects sales. At least in romance, only 75% of bestsellers were under $6
kirkusreviews.com/features/readi…
overdrivesteve.com/macmillan-publ…
Once again, the math doesn't add up
publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/in…
"... based on “anecdotal” data, Macmillan believes that “if library users cannot gain access to a new e-book from their library, 8% of those waiting will likely buy the e-book.” "
As librarians have been saying all along, the vast majority of people won't go out and buy a book, they'll read something else.
8% seems believably low enough.
If only 8% buy the book, Macmillan is leaving money on the table.
Right now, at @KCLS there are 282 holds on 55 ecopies (purchased pre-boycott)
Macmillan would give up 55 sales for 23.
They'd leave 32 sales on the table. How will that make them money?
So, Macmillan would walk away from $3300 because they can get $345 instead.
DO THEY NOT OWN A CALCULATOR?!
Let's say 8% of those 52 people bought the book instead.
That's 4.16 people.
That's... $62.36
That's a whopping $2.36 more than selling that 1 copy to a library.
Is it worth the bad PR and boycotts?
The actual average is 11.5
8% of 11.5 is .92
That's not even 1 copy sold! How does that recover the $60 lost in library sales?!
If 8% of those circs converted to sales? That's .66
You're walking away from $60 because for .66 of a sale?
Holds ratios.
Libraries don't like it when their patrons have to wait forever for a book. We have holds ratios--how many holds we allow per copy. Too many holds, BUY MORE COPIES.
That means for every 7.5 people waiting for a book, libraries buy another copy.
At $60/each, that's $798
That's 5.3 fewer sales and a loss of $678
The lower number is because we can afford to buy more in print, because it's so much less expensive.
Lower prices = libraries buy more!
1. Loses them massive amounts of sales AND even more money
2. Pisses off libraries, who are frequent, repeat, loyal customers
3. Is BAD for their authors. Really, really bad.
If we weren't a major player, why do they have positions that are JUST about marketing to schools and libraries?
Part of my job is buying books, but a big chunk of it is telling our users about awesome books they want to read and training my coworkers to do the same.
The part of my job where I'm not spending money on books, I'm creating demand.
When we put up staff picks on our website? Holds shoot up. We frequently have to buy additional copies to meet demand.