Thread by @Timcast

Hahahahahaha, ok ok Im so done

These people are insane

Journalism is dead

cc @politico @NatashaBertrand @kenvogel

You guys can duke it out

So lets break down the semantic debate

Natasha writes that they think Ukraine conspired with the Clinton Campaign and the DNC

Vogel writes that Ukraine's government was involved in sharing dirt with a DNC Consultant

So Yes, evidence DOES exist to "support" that idea

2/

The way Natasha characterizes what the conspiracy is gives them plausible deniability

"oh no we KNOW Ukraine did this, but we meant that they thought it was DIRECTLY with Clinton's campaign"

3/

But lets get real

Politico started it and other politico writers are refuting it

Seriously what the fuck are we supposed to believe?

fin/

More for good measure

What we know according to Politico

Ukraine was feeding info to a DNC consultant to hurt Trump and boost Clinton

The story was corroborated in May of 2019

thehill.com/opinion/white-…

Essentially if you read in Politico and The HIll that a DNC consultant was working with Ukranian officials to hurt Trump it stands to reason that evidence exists to support the idea the the DNC and Clinton's campaign from the top was involved

Support does not mean prove

Support does not even mean prove beyond a reasonable doubt

I'd say the Politico story from 2017 provides probable cause to investigate, which is exactly what Giuliani is doing

If you trust media like Democrats tend to you will go insane

axios.com/axios-hbo-poll…